For any resources you could need like sports handicapping odds, handicapping stats, schedules, or handicappers free picks and tips please click on any of the links on the right hand side of this page.
CLICK A CAPPERS NAME TO SEE THEIR PREMIUM DAILY EXPERT PLAYS + PREDICTIONS!
Schedule: NFL | CFB | MLB | NBA | CBB | NHL
WANT FREE SPORTS PICKS to your inbox? | Newsletter Sign-UP!
Date | Match Up | Rating | Score | Result | Profit | Lead Time | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
02-28-16 | Blazers v. Pacers -4.5 | Top | 111-102 | Loss | -105 | 26 h 3 m | Show |
This is 10* COAST-TO-COAST EXPRESS on the Indiana Pacers. We don't subscribe to any single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Scheduling and motivation levels: No need to overanalyze this one, as good as Damian Lillard has been and despite the Blazers having won 12 of their last 14, Portland comes into this one off a very satisfying 103-95 victory at Chicago just last night. For the Pacers though, this is an ultra-important game as they hit the road tomorrow for a five game trip, starting off in Cleveland. Not only will they be looking to take advantage of home floor, but they’re also out for revenge after falling 123-111 to Portland on December 3rd. It also wouldn’t be too hard to imagine the Blazers getting caught looking ahead to two whole days off after tonight’s game before continuing their marathon road trip at New York, Boston, Toronto and Detroit respectively. ATS statistics: Note that Portland is a poor 4-8 ATS this season when playing on back-to-back days, while Indiana is 19-8 ATS vs. teams with winning records and 8-5 ATS this year as a home fav in the 3.5 to six points range. The bottom line: The situational, motivational and trend based factors all point to the PACERS as the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-28-16 | Hornets v. Hawks -3.5 | Top | 76-87 | Win | 100 | 24 h 41 m | Show |
This is a 10* Southeast Division GAME OF THE YEAR on the Atlanta Hawks. We don't subscribe to any single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: History is against them: There’s no question that the Hornets have been playing great of late, but note that they’ve never posted five wins on a six-game road trip in franchise history. This one definitely sets up as a letdown spot for the home side after its thrilling 96-95 victory over Indiana on Friday, where Kemba Walker scored a layup with just 2.4 seconds left. If history is any precedence: Atlanta has to be loving its chances for a victory today as it’s gone 15-2 in the series in front of the home town crowd since 2007. Revenge factor: Charlotte beat the Hawks 107-84 on January 13th. ATS statistics: Note that the Hornets are just 17-18 ATS this season vs. good offensive teams which score 99-plus points per contest, while Atlanta is 20-17 ATS in the same position. The bottom line: Charlotte has been playing extremely well, while the Hawks for the most part have been struggling with offensive consistency. And that’s why we love this selection, it’s a great situational play as we expect the visitors to come in a tiny bit complacent, while the home side will be risking life and limb to try and string a couple wins together. Play on ATLANTA. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-26-16 | Columbia +9.5 v. Princeton | Top | 83-88 | Win | 100 | 26 h 17 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Columbia. We don't subscribe to any single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on what we feel to be a couple of key factors: Revenge: Two of the top teams in the Ivy League go head to head tonight, The Columbia Lions have won two straight and four of five, while Princeton has won six straight. So where’s the advantage you ask? We think the “revenge factor” is a major one today, the Tigers have won four straight and nine of the last ten in the series, including an 88-83 OT victory in Columbia on February 13th. ATS statistics: Note that Columbia is already 2-1 ATS this year in revenging a home loss vs. an opponent and 4-2 ATS off a win vs. a conference rival, while Princeton is just 2-3 ATS at home this season and only 2-3 ATS off a win vs. a conference rival. The bottom line: These teams are very evenly matched on both ends of the floor, but the revenge factor and these strong and relevant ATS trends, combined with what we feel to be a very healthy spread afforded to it, all do indeed make COLUMBIA the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-22-16 | Coyotes v. Capitals -1.5 | Top | 2-3 | Loss | -100 | 9 h 1 m | Show |
This is a 10* PUCK-LINE DESTRUCTION on the Washington Capitals. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Alexander Ovechkin: The Capitals’ super star has nine goals in his last seven games and 24 of his 38 goals over the last 26 contests. He’s also fared extremely well against Arizona throughout his career, posting four goals and eight assists in ten career meetings, including a goal and three helpers in this most recent home matchup. Arizona road woes: The Coyotes have lost three straight away from friendly confines, getting outscored 14-5 in the process. A sub-par power play is definitely to blame as Arizona is just 1 for 16 with the man advantage over its last four on the road. ATS statistics: Note that Arizona is just 8-12 (-1.6 units) after scoring four goals or more in its previous contest and only 8-15 (-5.6 units) in all non-conference games, while Washington is 11-5 (+4.4 units) in all non-conference games and 22-7 (+10 units) vs. teams with losing records. The bottom line: All signs point to an epic lop-sided destruction, play on the CAPITALS on the PUCK-LINE. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-21-16 | Lakers v. Bulls -7.5 | Top | 115-126 | Win | 100 | 29 h 11 m | Show |
This is a 10* TNT SUPER-BLOWOUT on the Chicago Bulls. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Injured legend: The Lakers have looked a lot more competitive of late, especially for bettors as they’ve covered in six straight games. A big reason has been the improved play of Kobe Bryant, who has averaged 24.9 over his last seven. Note though that Bryant would dislocate his right middle finger in Friday’s 119-113 loss to San Antonio and while the aging super star will get the start today, we don’t expect him to be nearly as effective. With their main weapon and offensive focal point relegated as a second or third option tonight, we have a hard time seeing the overachieving visitors keeping pace with this hungry home side. Rising Bulls?: Chicago stumbled into the break, but looked great on both ends of the floor in a 116-106 home over Toronto on Friday that ended a five-game skid. Pau Gasol, who played 6.5 years with Bryant in LA, would barely miss posting a triple-double with 18 points, 11 boards and nine assists. Gasol dominated his former team on January 28th as well with 21 points, 12 boards and seven assists in the Bulls’ 114-91 victory. If history is any precedence: The Bulls have to like their chances today in being able to string together a couple of convincing victories as they’ve won seven of the last nine in the series, including the last four on their home floor. ATS statistics: Note that LA is just 5-7 ATS this season after scoring 105 points or more, while Chicago is 12-9 ATS in all non-conference contests. The bottom line: With their leader injured, we expect the Lakers to come out flat tonight, it’s a perfect storm of factors working in favor of the BULLS, lay the points. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-21-16 | Pelicans v. Pistons -5 | Top | 111-106 | Loss | -110 | 25 h 44 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on the Detroit Pistons. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Uphill battle: Despite beating the 76er’s 121-114 on Friday and going 10-7 since January 13th, the Pelicans face a daunting task in their quest for a second-straight playoff appearance, right now they’re 12th in the Western Conference, six games behind Houston and Utah for eighth place. On the cusp: Conversely, despite a brutal stretch in which they’ve lost four straight and seven of their last ten overall, the Pistons still sit just 1.5 games back of Charlotte and Chicago for the final two spots in the East. Detroit got a much needed boost via trades before the deadline, acquiring Tobias Harris from the Magic for Brandon Jennings and Erlan Ilyasova, while also getting Donatas Motiejunas and veteran guard Marcus Thornton from the Rockets: "You're going to have to take some risk in order to get better," Pistons coach Stan Van Gundy said. "There are no deals where there's no risk and we feel like this was a risk we could handle." Revenge factor: Detroit will be looking to atone for a lacklustre 115-99 setback at New Orleans on January 21st. In fact, the Pelicans have won three straight in Detroit and haven’t lost to the Pistons whatsoever since February 2012. ATS statistics: Note that New Orleans is just 5-13 ATS in non-conference games this season and only 9-12 ATS after scoring 105 points or more, while Detroit is 4-3 ATS this year as a home fav in the 3.5 to six points range and in 16-9 ATS in all home games. The bottom line: With a game tomorrow night at Cleveland, it’s going to be all hands on deck for the home side and we expect this determined play to ultimately prove to be the difference in the outcome of this contest. Lay the points on the PISTONS. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-20-16 | Oregon State v. Oregon -10.5 | Top | 81-91 | Loss | -105 | 30 h 58 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on Oregon. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: It’s payback time: Oregon State beat the Ducks 70-57 in Corvallis on January 3rd, Oregon had come into that game having won four straight and seven of eight in the series previous to that. Oregon is 88th in the nation in averaging 77.3 PPG. Letdown spot: After winning three straight, the Beavers got spanked 83-71 at Cal last Saturday. Momentum is hard to gain, but it’s even harder to get it back once lost. Note that Oregon State is ranked 235th in the nation in putting up an average of 71 PPG. ATS statistics: Oregon State is just 2-9 ATS in its last 11 on the road vs. teams with a home winning percentage of at least .600 and only 2-10 ATS in their last 12 on the road vs. teams with winning home records, while Oregon is 8-1 ATS in its last nine at home vs. teams with a road winning percentage of below .400, 8-1 ATS in its last nine at home vs. teams with a losing road record and 6-1 ATS in their last seven vs. teams with winning records overall. The bottom line: Oregon is 15-0 in Eugene this season, while Oregon State is just 3-5 on the road. With a chance to avenge the earlier loss to their arch-rival, we look for the DUCKS to put the pedal to the metal from start to finish. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-20-16 | Florida v. South Carolina -2.5 | Top | 69-73 | Win | 100 | 20 h 27 m | Show |
This is a 10* BIG TIGER on South Carolina. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Motivation: The Gators are 17-9 and have won four of their last six. The Gamecocks are 21-5, but have lost two straight and three of their last five. For us, this sets up nicely, it’s a natural letdown spot for the visitors, while the home side will be desperate to prove that it’s opening season surge was no fluke. Look deeper into the numbers: If you look a little closer at Florida’s 17-9 record, you realize that it’s just 1-5 vs. ranked teams this season, a lone victory came over WVU in January. ATS statistics: Note that Florida is just 3-4 ATS this year off a win vs. a conference rival and only 1-4 ATS in February, while South Carolina is 8-3 ATS at home and 14-6 ATS when playing the role of favorite. The bottom line: There’s no way this game means more to the Gators than it does to the GAMECOCKS, we’re backing the hungry and desperate home side. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-19-16 | Harvard +7.5 v. Columbia | Top | 76-90 | Loss | -110 | 29 h 36 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Harvard. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Desperation breeds motivation: The Crimson will be eager to break out of their funk, having dropped six of their last seven. Revenge factor: Harvard had won five straight in this series before Columbia took the first meeting of this season, 57-55 on the road on January 30th. Tough defensive play: Harvard has been all over the map as far as its consistency on the offensive end of the floor, but one constant has been its defensive play, it allows an average of just 66 points a game, ranked 48th in the country. Classic letdown spot: The Lions are 6-2 in Ivy League play, but come in off a tough loss to Princeton last time out. It’s hard to gain momentum and once lost, it’s even harder to get it back. ATS statistics: Note that Harvard is 2-1 ATS in its last three in revenging a loss vs. an opponent, while Columbia is just 3-4 ATS vs. conference opponents and only 2-3 ATS in front of the home town crowd this season. The bottom line: A hungry HARVARD team catches Columbia complacent and while we won’t be so bold as to call for the outright upset, we will in the end recommend grabbing as many points as you can as we look for the visitors to keep this one a lot closer than what the oddsmakers are leading us to believe. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-18-16 | Spurs v. Clippers +3.5 | Top | 86-105 | Win | 100 | 32 h 11 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on the LA Clippers. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Significant injuries: The Spurs will once again be without the services of big man Tim Duncan and veteran Manu Ginobili tonight. Home court advantage: The Spurs are 28-0 at home, but a mere 17-8 on the road. Obviously that’s still a great record, but it’s definitely been more of an adventure for San Antonio whenever it’s played away from friendly confines. LA is 17-8 at home and with a game vs. the Warriors on deck next, we’re expecting the team to leave everything it has on the floor tonight in trying to secure the upset. Revenge factor: San Antonio won the first matchup of the year, a 115-107 victory on December 18th. ATS statistics: Note that the Spurs are interestingly just 4-5 ATS in their last nine vs. poor defensive teams which allow 99-plus points per contest, while the Clippers are 9-7 ATS in trying to revenge a loss vs. an opponent and 6-3 ATS in their last nine vs. good offensive teams which score 99-plus points per game. The bottom line: Even without Blake Griffin in the lineup tonight, we love the CLIPPERS in this spot, there are a bunch of different situational and strong trend based factors working in their favor today and while we obviously wouldn’t be shocked by an outright upset, we will in the end recommend grabbing as many points as you can. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-16-16 | Buffalo +7.5 v. Akron | Top | 70-80 | Loss | -110 | 30 h 23 m | Show |
This is a 10* DESTRUCTION on Buffalo. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few simple common sense factors: Revenge: Buffalo fell to Akron 75-71 on January 5th. Motivation: After back-to-back SU/ATS losses, the Bulls will be hungry here to break back into the win column. Conversely, after surging to seven straight SU/ATS victories, Akron is coming off an 80-79 loss at Northern Illinois as a 2-point favorite. Once momentum has been lost, there’s no question that it’s difficult to get it back. Look ahead spot: On top of this being a prime letdown spot, it also sets up as a classic look-ahead scenario with a game at Kent State on Friday. ATS statistics: Note that Buffalo is 6-1 ATS in its last seven in trying to revenge a home loss vs. an opponent and 4-1 ATS this season after allowing 80 points or more, while Akron is just 2-3 ATS in its last five as a home fav in the 6.5 to nine points range and already 0-2 ATS this year off a loss vs. a conference rival. The bottom line: While we won’t be so bold as to call for the outright upset, we will in the end recommend grabbing as many points as you can as we look for the visitors to at the very least, take this one down to the wire and to comfortably sneak in through the back door down the stretch. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-15-16 | Maple Leafs v. Blackhawks -1.5 | Top | 2-7 | Win | 106 | 28 h 43 m | Show |
This is a 10* PUCK-LINE DESTRUCTION on the Chicago Blackhawks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Motivation: After losing three straight at home, do you think the Blackhawks will “look past” the Leafs tonight, or look to take advantage of their transitioning opponent? Obviously the latter, it’ll be all hands on deck as Chicago looks to cap a frustrating home stand before then hitting the road. Leafs injury woes: Toronto comes in off a hugely satisfying 5-2 win at Vancouver on Saturday and with injuries to top forward James van Riemsdyk, Tyler Bozak, Nazem Kadri, Joffrey Lupul and with captain Dion Phaneuf having been shipped over to Ottawa on Tuesday, there’s no question in our minds that this sets up as a classic letdown spot for the visitors. Woeful power play: The Leafs possess the league’s worst power play at 14.6 percent and they’re just 2 for 49 in their last 15 games. If history is any precedence: The Hawks have to be loving their chances today, they’ve won 10 of 12 in the series and five straight matches at the United Center. ATS statistics: Note that Toronto is just 4-7 (-2.1 units) after a win by two goals or more this year, while Chicago is 21-7 (+10 units) vs. teams with losing records and 5-1 (+3.9 units) after playing three consecutive home games. The bottom line: The Leafs are catching this hungry BLACKHAWKS team at the most inopportune time, all signs do indeed point to an epic lop-sided destruction. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-13-16 | Texas v. Iowa State -6 | Top | 75-85 | Win | 100 | 29 h 55 m | Show |
This is a 10* BIG TIGER on Iowa State. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Desperation breeds motivation: Iowa State is ranked 15th in the Nation, but has lost three of its last four. Not only will it be looking to break the slide, but it’ll also be out to avenge a 94-91 OT loss to the Longhorns back on January 12th. Suffice it to say, we believe the determination and focus that the home side plays with today will result in production on the court: "We had great chances to win down the stretch. We were up. We just didn't finish the game. That's the bottom line,” said Cyclones coach Steve Prohm about his team’s recent slide. The numbers don’t lie: Texas has been on quite a role of late, but we feel it is primed for a letdown here finally in facing this revenge minded home side and the numbers back up that assumption as the Longhorns are just 9-13 ATS their last 22 off a loss vs. a conference rival and just 4-5 ATS in their last nine as a road dog in the 3.5 to six points range. ATS statistics: Note that Iowa State has dominated in this spot for bettors this season, going 4-2 ATS after allowing 80 points or more and a perfect 2-0 ATS in trying to revenge a road loss vs. an opponent. The bottom line: All of the factors listed absolutely make IOWA STATE the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-13-16 | Oregon v. Stanford +6 | Top | 72-76 | Win | 100 | 24 h 27 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on Stanford. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Desperation breeds motivation: There is no doubt that the Cardinal will be playing with desperation today, they’ve lost four straight, both SU and ATS, most recently a 62-50 setback to Oregon State on Thursday. Conversely, we absolutely feel that this sets up as a natural letdown spot for the Ducks, who after winning both SU and ATS in six straight games, would finally fall 83-63 at Cal as 1.5 points favs last time out. It’s hard to gain momentum back after losing it and suffice it to say, this one definitely sets up as a classic letdown spot for the visitors in our professional opinion. Revenge: Stanford has lost two straight in the series, both SU and ATS, most recently a 71-58 setback at Oregon on January 10th. ATS statistics: Note that the Cardinal are 17-3 SU the last 20 in this series when playing in front of the home town crowd. The bottom line: It’s not too hard to imagine the 20-5 Ducks coming into this one a bit complacent as they hit a “vanilla” part of their schedule, with a game vs. the hapless Beavers next week and while we won’t be so bold as to predict an outright upset, we will in the end recommend grabbing as many points as you can. Play on STANFORD. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-11-16 | Wizards v. Bucks -1 | Top | 92-99 | Win | 100 | 30 h 54 m | Show |
This is a 10* GAME OF THE MONTH on the Milwaukee Bucks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Revenge: The Bucks fell 106-101 to Washington on January 13th and will be highly motivated to avoid the season series sweep, losing the first three meetings of the year. Momentum: Milwaukee played like a desperate team in its 112-111 win over the Celtics on Tuesday, breaking a stretch of five-straight losses. The Bucks would allow the C’s to battle back from 19 down in the fourth quarter, but were able to finally find a way to pull out the victory. If the team had lost that one, we’d likely be going the other way on this selection, but with the victory, we like Milwaukee to come in focused and confident tonight. ATS statistics: Note that Washington is just 1-3 ATS this year as a road dog of three points or less and only 13-15 ATS vs. poor defensive teams which allow 99-plus points per contest, while Milwaukee is 18-15 ATS this season in trying to revenge a loss vs. an opponent and 13-9 ATS in front of the home town crowd. The bottom line: With the All-Star break looming, we think the visitors get caught looking ahead to that time off, while the hungrier BUCKS take advantage and build off their latest victory. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-10-16 | Kings -4 v. 76ers | Top | 114-110 | Push | 0 | 29 h 48 m | Show |
This is a 10* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Sacramento Kings. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: “The Brain” stays: There were reports that coach George Karl was on his way out of Sacramento, but GM Vlade Divac has given him a second chance and with one last opportunity to secure a win after eight losses out of their last nine, we look for the “The Brain” and his team to rise to the occasion. Revenge: The hungry Kings will be eager to atone for a particularly low-spot of their season when they fell 110-105 to the 76ers at home on December 30th. DeMarcus Cousins: Keep your eyes on the big man, he’s averaging 31.0 points and 17.3 boards in his last three vs. Philadelphia. ATS statistics: Note that Sacramento is 5-3 ATS this year after three or more consecutive losses and 4-3 ATS after playing three consecutive road games, while Philadelphia is a horrible 11-13 ATS at home this season and only 2-3 ATS this year as a home dog of 3.5 to six points. The bottom line: We think a motivated and highly focused KINGS team finally comes to play a full four quarters and comfortably pulls away down the stretch for the ATS cover. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-09-16 | Celtics v. Bucks +5.5 | Top | 111-112 | Win | 100 | 30 h 50 m | Show |
This is a 10* EXPRESS on the Milwaukee Bucks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Motivation levels: Boston is rolling, it’s won nine of its last ten, most recently a 128-119 victory over Sacramento on Sunday. That also included a hugely satisfying victory over Cleveland on Friday. The Bucks on the other hand will be playing with extreme desperation as they look to break a season-high five-game slide. Desperation breeds motivation while winning leads to contentedness. Revenge factor: The Bucks play with revenge today, they fell 99-83 at home to Boston on November 10th. Note that Milwaukee has in fact dropped two straight and seven of their last ten to the C’s in front of the home town crowd. Getting healthier: The home side expects a big boost today with the return from OJ Mayo, who has been sitting for 11 games with a hamstring injury (one other players to keep your eyes on today is Bucks’ centre Greg Monroe, who is averaging 20.5 points on 56.3 percent shooting over his last eight games). ATS statistics: Note that Boston is just 3-5 ATS this year after three or more consecutive SU victories, while Milwaukee is 6-1 ATS after three or more consecutive SU losses. The bottom line: The situational, motivational, personnel and trend based factors do all indeed point to the BUCKS as the sharp move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-09-16 | Michigan State v. Purdue -1.5 | Top | 81-82 | Loss | -110 | 29 h 44 m | Show |
This is a 10* BIG-TIGER on Purdue. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Revenge factor: To say this is a “revenge” game would be a bit of an understatement, as MSU has won seven-straight in the series. Rebounding battle: These are a couple of the leagues best on the glass, as MSU leads the country at plus 12.8. Purdue has been dominant down low all year as well and we feel this will play a major factor in the outcome of this contest as the Boilermakers are third in the nation in rebounding differential at plus-11.8 and have been the only team to yet be out rebounded in a game. This negates the Spartans strength and tips the scales in favor of the home side. Even defensively: These teams are also a “wash” defensively, MSU leads the conference in almost every category, while Purdue is right behind in second. ATS statistics: Note that Michigan State is just 2-5 ATS this year vs. good offensive teams which score 77-plus points per contest, while Purdue is 6-4 ATS in the same position. The bottom line: It’s hard to imagine Michigan State “looking past” Purdue today, but with a game vs. Indiana next Saturday, the team sitting just one spot ahead of it in the league standings, it’s definitely not out of the realm of possibility. And combined with the other situational, motivational and trend based factors listed above, all signs do indeed point to the BOILERMAKERS as the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-08-16 | Notre Dame v. Clemson -1.5 | Top | 89-83 | Loss | -115 | 32 h 18 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Clemson. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: A classic letdown spot: The Irish are coming off a huge 80-76 win over North Carolina and suffice it to say, all signs do indeed point to a classic letdown for the visitors. Revenge: Notre Dame is a perfect 3-0 SU and 2-1 ATS in the series dating back to 2014, including an 81-67 victory March 7th, 2015. Hungry home side: The Tigers are coming off a loss to Virginia Tech and will be hungry to get back into the win column and finally break their run of futility to the Irish (note that Clemson does have good conference wins over Duke, Miami and Louisville this year). ATS statistics: Note that Notre Dame is just 1-3 ATS this year when playing with one or less days rest and just 3-7 ATS after scoring 80 points or more, while Clemson is 9-2 ATS this season vs. the conference and 2-0 ATS when playing with one or less days rest. The bottom line: Behind their trademark tough defensive play, we look for the TIGERS to find a way to get the job done at the end of the night. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-08-16 | Bulls +4.5 v. Hornets | Top | 91-108 | Loss | -110 | 30 h 25 m | Show |
This is a 10* REVENGE DESTRUCTION on the Chicago Bulls. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different basic factors: Revenge: Charlotte has won two of three over Chicago, most recently a 102-96 victory on December 5th. Derek Rose: Chicago star Jimmy Butler won’t be playing in this one, but D-Rose has picked up the slack by averaging 19.5 points and 9.5 assists the last two games. ATS statistics: This is in fact a spot in which the Bulls have dominated in for bettors, going 12-8 ATS last 20 after allowing 105 points or more, while Charlotte has struggled in this spot by going just 14-17 ATS vs. good offensive teams which score 99-plus points per contest and just 6-10 ATS after scoring 105 points or more. The bottom line: With a five game road trip which starts on Wednesday, we think the home side comes into this one a bit complacent and despite being down a key player, we ultimately feel that the level of desperation in which the BULLS play with today will prove to be the difference. Play on CHICAGO. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-07-16 | Panthers v. Broncos +4.5 | Top | 10-24 | Win | 100 | 320 h 1 m | Show |
This is a 10* GAME OF THE MONTH on the Denver Broncos. |
|||||||
02-06-16 | Florida State v. Wake Forest +4 | Top | 91-71 | Loss | -110 | 20 h 15 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Wake Forest. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Desperation breeds motivation: The Demon Deacons will desperately be trying to snap a season-long seven-game losing streak before hitting the road for three-straight away from friendly confines. Suffice it to say, we expect a big time effort from the home side this afternoon. Note though that the Deac’s strength of schedule is ranked No. 1 nationally in the Sagarin Ratings and the ESPN BPI, having already played nine ranked opponents. Classic look ahead spot: FSU next plays Syracuse next week, a team which it lost to twice last year. Revenge factor: Wake plays with revenge after falling 82-76 to the Seminoles on January 28th, 2015. Home court advantage: The Deacons are 14-6 SU their last 20 vs. FSU in front of the home town crowd. The bottom line: The situation and the trends do indeed point to WAKE FOREST as the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-05-16 | Bucks +7.5 v. Jazz | Top | 81-84 | Win | 100 | 31 h 48 m | Show |
This is a 10* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Milwaukee Bucks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Letdown/look-ahead spot: We feel this sets up as a classic spot bet against the Jazz, they’ve won four straight, but had to hold on for dear life in an 85-81 win over Denver on Wednesday, unable to cover the 8-point spread. And with a three game road trip starting tomorrow night in Phoenix, it’s definitely not too hard to imagine the home side looking past their Eastern Conference opponent this evening. Revenge: The Bucks have dropped 13 straight in Utah. Desperation breeds motivation: While the Jazz are flying high, the Bucks come in having lost four straight and five in a row on the road. There’s no question in our minds who will be the more motivated side in this one. ATS statistics: Note that Milwaukee is 5-1 ATS vs. Northwest division opponents this season and 5-1 ATS after three or more consecutive SU losses, while Utah is only 1-3 ATS after scoring 85 points or less and just 2-4 ATS after playing three consecutive home games. The bottom line: While we wouldn’t be shocked by an outright upset, we will in the end recommend grabbing as many points as you can as we look for the BUCKS to risk life and limb to secure a victory today and expect them to at the very least, take this one down to the wire and comfortably sneak in through the back door down the stretch. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-05-16 | Dartmouth v. Pennsylvania -2 | Top | 64-71 | Win | 100 | 28 h 42 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Pennsylvania. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Desperation breeds motivation: The Quakers are looking to end a four-game slide and to take advantage of a Big Green team which had won three in a row before back to back setbacks at the hands of Columbia and Cornell. Moving in the right direction: Pennsylvania will desperately be trying to secure its first conference win, but it’s come very close, surrounding a blowout loss to Yale, the Quakers would drop an OT game vs. Princeton on January 9th, while also falling at Brown 89-83 last weekend: “Against Brown, I think we did a lot of good things for long stretches,” head coach Steve Donahue assessed. “We played solid offense. The guys are getting better, there’s good growth, they’re all in, they keep competing. Now we just gotta put it together for 40 minutes,. One thing that really hurt us was [our shooting] at the foul line.” ATS statistics: Note that Darmouth is just 1-5 ATS in its last six on the road and only 6-17-1 ATS in its last 24 games following a SU loss, while Pennsylvania is 5-2 ATS its last seven in front of the home town crowd and 6-2 ATS in its last eight at home vs. teams with losing road records. The bottom line: Despite injuries, the QUAKERS are definitely knocking on the door for their first conference victory, note that Big Green has won just four games at the Palestra since 1959. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-03-16 | Oklahoma State v. Texas Tech -6 | Top | 61-63 | Loss | -110 | 31 h 30 m | Show |
This is a 10* BIG TIGER on Texas Tech. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Motivation levels: We’ll argue that Texas Tech will be the much more motivated team tonight, while the Red Raiders are still 12-8 and 8th overall in the Big 12, they come into this one having lost three straight. Oklahoma State on the other hand is 11-10 and 9th in the conference, but has won two of its last four, most recently a very satisfying 74-63 win over Auburn. ATS statistics: The Red Raiders are 7-3 ATS in their last ten at home and 7-1 ATS in their last eight home games vs. a team with a losing road record, while the Cowboys are just 3-6 ATS after scoring 80 points or more and only 4-8 ATS vs. teams with winning records. The bottom line: The situation and the trends both suggest that TEXAS TECH is indeed the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-03-16 | Heat v. Mavs -4 | Top | 93-90 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 15 m | Show |
This is a 10* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Dallas Mavericks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Revenge factor: Dallas suffered a 106-82 setback to the Heat on New Years Day, a loss which still represents the team’s second lowest point total of the season. The Mavericks have in fact lost eight of the last nine in the series. Letdown spot: It’s hard to gain back momentum and after having their four-game win streak halted in a 115-102 loss at Houston just last night, suffice it to say we think the Heat come in with “heavy legs” this evening. ATS statistics: Note that Miami is just 4-5 ATS in its last nine when playing on back-to-back days and just 2-6 ATS after allowing 105 points or more, while Dallas is 14-7 ATS after allowing 105 points or more and 12-10 ATS this season in trying to revenge a loss vs. an opponent. The bottom line: Both teams have injury concerns, so that area is a “wash,” DALLAS though clearly has the situational, motivational and trend based factors all working in its favor today. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-03-16 | Magic +13.5 v. Thunder | Top | 114-117 | Win | 100 | 31 h 5 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on the Orlando Magic. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Classic letdown/look-ahead spot: This is as big as it gets with this angle, the Thunder have won nine of their last ten, including four straight and after playing the lowly Eastern Conference Magic tonight, have a battle at defending champion Golden State on Saturday. Suffice it to say, it’s obviously not too hard to imagine OKC looking past Orlando this evening. Revenge: The Magic fell 139-136 in double OT at home to the Thunder on November 30th. Orlando has also lost six straight in OKC. Road warriors: The Magic are 10-7 SU against the Western conference with six of those setbacks decided by six points or less, including three in the extra frame. ATS statistics: Note that Orlando is 12-4 ATS in non-conference game this year, while OKC is just 8-13 ATS in non-conference contests and only 7-18 ATS vs. teams with losing records. The bottom line: We won’t be so bold as to call for an outright upset, but with the situational and trend based factors working in their favor, we look for the MAGIC to keep this one a lot closer than what the oddsmakers are leading us to believe. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-03-16 | Notre Dame v. Miami (Fla) -7 | Top | 70-79 | Win | 100 | 30 h 41 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Miami Florida. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Revenge factor: ND took both games vs. Miami last year. Home court advantage: The Hurricanes have won eight straight at home. It’s averaged a 12.9 points margin in its last four ACC home games. Experience advantage: Notre Dame had an experience edge last year, but not so this season as Miami boasts a starting lineup of seniors. Classic lookahead spot: It’s hard not to imagine the Fighting Irish not getting caught looking ahead to their game at home vs. UNC on Saturday. ATS statistics: Note that Notre Dame is just 1-2 ATS as an underdog this year, while Miami is 11-7 ATS as the favorite and 7-3 ATS in front of the home town crowd. The bottom line: The situational, motivational and trend based factors do all indeed point to MIAMI as the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-01-16 | North Carolina v. Louisville -2 | Top | 65-71 | Win | 100 | 28 h 28 m | Show |
This is a 10* ACC GAME OF THE MONTH on Louisville. |
|||||||
01-30-16 | Kings +3 v. Grizzlies | Top | 117-121 | Loss | -105 | 27 h 13 m | Show |
This is a 10* REVENGE ASSASSIN on the Sacramento Kings. |
|||||||
01-30-16 | Kentucky v. Kansas -6 | Top | 84-90 | Push | 0 | 26 h 16 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on Kansas. |
|||||||
01-30-16 | Washington v. USC -7 | Top | 88-98 | Win | 100 | 22 h 6 m | Show |
This is a 10* Pac-12 ASSASSIN on USC. |
|||||||
01-30-16 | Fordham +2.5 v. Massachusetts | Top | 78-72 | Win | 100 | 19 h 7 m | Show |
This is a 10* MID-MAJOR MAULING on Fordham. |
|||||||
01-29-16 | Pennsylvania +14 v. Yale | Top | 58-81 | Loss | -110 | 28 h 26 m | Show |
This is a 10* ART OF WAR on Pennsylvania. |
|||||||
01-29-16 | Princeton v. Brown +8 | Top | 83-59 | Loss | -110 | 27 h 17 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Brown. |
|||||||
01-27-16 | Hornets v. Jazz -5.5 | Top | 73-102 | Win | 100 | 28 h 19 m | Show |
This is a 10* REVENGE ASSASSIN on the Utah Jazz. |
|||||||
01-27-16 | DePaul v. Butler -13.5 | Top | 53-67 | Win | 100 | 27 h 45 m | Show |
This is a 10* MID-MAJOR MAULING on Butler. |
|||||||
01-25-16 | Kansas +1 v. Iowa State | Top | 72-85 | Loss | -105 | 30 h 57 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on Kansas. |
|||||||
01-25-16 | Detroit +7 v. Green Bay | Top | 108-115 | Push | 0 | 29 h 58 m | Show |
This is a 10* Horizon League GAME OF THE YEAR on Detroit. |
|||||||
01-24-16 | Patriots -3.5 v. Broncos | Top | 18-20 | Loss | -100 | 163 h 6 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on the New England Patriots. |
|||||||
01-22-16 | Toledo v. Northern Illinois | Top | 49-58 | Loss | -110 | 24 h 3 m | Show |
This is a 10* MAC GAME OF THE WEEK on Toledo. |
|||||||
01-21-16 | Kentucky -1 v. Arkansas | Top | 80-66 | Win | 100 | 27 h 11 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on Kentucky. |
|||||||
01-18-16 | Warriors v. Cavs -1 | Top | 132-98 | Loss | -110 | 30 h 26 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on the Cleveland Cavaliers. |
|||||||
01-18-16 | Syracuse v. Duke -11.5 | Top | 64-62 | Loss | -110 | 29 h 20 m | Show |
This is a 10* ART OF WAR on Duke. |
|||||||
01-17-16 | Steelers v. Broncos -6 | Top | 16-23 | Win | 100 | 174 h 15 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on the Denver Broncos. |
|||||||
01-15-16 | Heat -3 v. Nuggets | Top | 98-95 | Push | 0 | 32 h 14 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on the Miami Heat. |
|||||||
01-15-16 | George Washington v. Dayton -5 | Top | 70-77 | Win | 100 | 25 h 56 m | Show |
This is a 10* BIG TIGER on Dayton. |
|||||||
01-14-16 | California v. Stanford +2.5 | Top | 71-77 | Win | 100 | 32 h 11 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Stanford. |
|||||||
01-13-16 | Oklahoma v. Oklahoma State +8.5 | Top | 74-72 | Win | 100 | 29 h 27 m | Show |
This is a 10* play on OKLAHOMA STATE. |
|||||||
01-13-16 | Hawks v. Hornets +2.5 | Top | 84-107 | Win | 100 | 28 h 33 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on the Charlotte Hornets. |
|||||||
01-11-16 | Spurs v. Nets +12.5 | Top | 106-79 | Loss | -110 | 30 h 18 m | Show |
This is a 10* ART OF WAR on the Brooklyn Nets. |
|||||||
01-09-16 | Warriors v. Kings +7.5 | Top | 128-116 | Loss | -110 | 31 h 37 m | Show |
This is an 8* play on the LA Kings. |
|||||||
01-09-16 | Steelers v. Bengals +2.5 | Top | 18-16 | Win | 100 | 127 h 13 m | Show |
This is a 10* play on the Cincinnati Bengals. |
|||||||
01-09-16 | Arizona State +5.5 v. UCLA | Top | 74-81 | Loss | -110 | 25 h 5 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on Arizona State. |
|||||||
01-09-16 | Chiefs -3 v. Texans | Top | 30-0 | Win | 100 | 124 h 34 m | Show |
This is a 10* play on the Kansas City Chiefs. |
|||||||
01-09-16 | Texas A&M v. Tennessee +5.5 | Top | 92-88 | Win | 100 | 21 h 15 m | Show |
This is a 10* SUPER-BLOWOUT on Tennessee. |
|||||||
01-09-16 | DePaul +10 v. Georgetown | Top | 63-74 | Loss | -110 | 20 h 16 m | Show |
This is a 10* ART OF WAR on DePaul. |
|||||||
01-08-16 | Western Michigan +13 v. Akron | Top | 53-62 | Win | 100 | 31 h 30 m | Show |
This is a 10* BIG TIGER on Western Michigan. |
|||||||
01-07-16 | Maple Leafs v. Kings -1.5 | Top | 1-2 | Loss | -100 | 32 h 52 m | Show |
This is a 10* PUCK-LINE DESTRUCTION on the LA Kings. |
|||||||
01-07-16 | Arizona v. UCLA +3 | Top | 84-87 | Win | 100 | 30 h 23 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on UCLA. |
|||||||
01-07-16 | Jazz v. Rockets -9 | Top | 94-103 | Push | 0 | 29 h 24 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on the Houston Rockets. |
|||||||
01-07-16 | Florida Atlantic +9 v. Marshall | Top | 67-90 | Loss | -110 | 28 h 19 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on Florida Atlantic. |
|||||||
01-06-16 | La Salle +11 v. Fordham | Top | 61-66 | Win | 100 | 28 h 25 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on La Salle. |
|||||||
01-05-16 | Marquette +9 v. Providence | Top | 65-64 | Win | 100 | 29 h 5 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Marquette. |
|||||||
01-03-16 | Suns v. Lakers +1 | Top | 77-97 | Win | 100 | 30 h 17 m | Show |
This is a 10* GAME OF THE MONTH on the LA Lakers. |
|||||||
01-03-16 | Vikings +3.5 v. Packers | Top | 20-13 | Win | 100 | 129 h 9 m | Show |
This is a 10* play on the Minnesota Vikings. |
|||||||
01-03-16 | Bucs +11 v. Panthers | Top | 10-38 | Loss | -110 | 125 h 54 m | Show |
This is a 10* play on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. |
|||||||
01-03-16 | Jets v. Bills +3.5 | Top | 17-22 | Win | 100 | 122 h 40 m | Show |
This is a 10* play on the Buffalo Bills. |
|||||||
01-03-16 | Saints v. Falcons -4 | Top | 20-17 | Loss | -105 | 122 h 40 m | Show |
This is a 10* play on the Atlanta Falcons. |
|||||||
01-03-16 | Steelers v. Browns +10 | Top | 28-12 | Loss | -110 | 122 h 40 m | Show |
This is a 10* play on the Cleveland Browns. |
|||||||
01-02-16 | Gonzaga v. San Francisco +12 | Top | 102-94 | Win | 100 | 31 h 37 m | Show |
This is a 10* BAIL-OUT BLOWOUT on San Francisco. |
|||||||
01-02-16 | TCU v. Oregon -7 | Top | 47-41 | Loss | -102 | 33 h 9 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on Oregon. |
|||||||
01-02-16 | Suns v. Kings -6.5 | Top | 119-142 | Win | 100 | 7 h 55 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on the Sacramento Kings. |
|||||||
01-01-16 | Iowa v. Stanford -6 | Top | 16-45 | Win | 100 | 78 h 14 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on Stanford. |
|||||||
01-01-16 | Notre Dame v. Ohio State -6.5 | Top | 28-44 | Win | 100 | 74 h 9 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on Ohio State. |
|||||||
12-31-15 | Michigan State v. Alabama -9.5 | Top | 0-38 | Win | 100 | 508 h 9 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on Alabama. |
|||||||
12-31-15 | Oklahoma -3.5 v. Clemson | Top | 17-37 | Loss | -110 | 504 h 59 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER Oklahoma. |
|||||||
12-30-15 | Wisconsin v. USC -3.5 | Top | 23-21 | Loss | -100 | 37 h 46 m | Show |
This is a 10* ART OF WAR on USC. |
|||||||
12-30-15 | Memphis v. Auburn -3 | Top | 10-31 | Win | 100 | 26 h 57 m | Show |
This is a 10* SUPER-BLOWOUT on Auburn. |
|||||||
12-29-15 | St. Louis +14 v. Kansas State | Top | 47-75 | Loss | -110 | 30 h 50 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Saint Louis. |
|||||||
12-28-15 | IUPU-Indianapolis +23 v. Butler | Top | 54-92 | Loss | -110 | 29 h 11 m | Show |
This is a 10* GAME OF THE WEEK on IUPUI. |
|||||||
12-27-15 | Texas Southern +17 v. Syracuse | Top | 67-80 | Win | 100 | 25 h 7 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Texas Southern. |
|||||||
12-27-15 | Texans v. Titans +5 | Top | 34-6 | Loss | -110 | 48 h 34 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on the Tennessee Titans. |
|||||||
12-26-15 | Tulsa v. Virginia Tech -13.5 | Top | 52-55 | Loss | -115 | 33 h 51 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on Virginia Tech. |
|||||||
12-24-15 | Chargers +5.5 v. Raiders | Top | 20-23 | Win | 100 | 80 h 51 m | Show |
This is a 10* GAME OF THE WEEK on the San Diego Chargers. |
|||||||
12-24-15 | Cincinnati v. San Diego State -1.5 | Top | 7-42 | Win | 100 | 32 h 24 m | Show |
This is a 10* SUPER BLOWOUT on San Diego State. |
|||||||
12-23-15 | Boise State v. Northern Illinois +8.5 | Top | 55-7 | Loss | -110 | 27 h 37 m | Show |
This is a 10* DESTRUCTION on Northern Illinois. |
|||||||
12-22-15 | South Florida +16 v. Seton Hall | Top | 49-66 | Loss | -110 | 24 h 59 m | Show |
This is a 10* ART OF WAR on South Florida. |
|||||||
12-21-15 | San Francisco +17.5 v. St. Mary's | Top | 52-74 | Loss | -110 | 33 h 20 m | Show |
This is a 10* GAME OF THE WEEK on San Francisco. |
|||||||
12-21-15 | Western Kentucky -2.5 v. South Florida | Top | 45-35 | Win | 100 | 26 h 7 m | Show |
This is a 10* GAME OF THE WEEK on Western Kentucky. |
|||||||
12-20-15 | Browns +14.5 v. Seahawks | Top | 13-30 | Loss | -107 | 164 h 58 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on the Cleveland Browns. |
|||||||
12-19-15 | Kentucky -10 v. Ohio State | Top | 67-74 | Loss | -110 | 23 h 18 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Kentucky. |
|||||||
12-16-15 | Northern Arizona +24 v. Arizona | Top | 37-92 | Loss | -110 | 32 h 10 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on Northern Arizona. |
|||||||
12-14-15 | Southern Miss v. South Alabama -6 | Top | 57-54 | Loss | -110 | 28 h 42 m | Show |
This is a 10* GAME OF THE WEEK on South Alabama. |
|||||||
12-13-15 | Falcons +7.5 v. Panthers | Top | 0-38 | Loss | -115 | 144 h 28 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on the Atlanta Falcons. |
|||||||
12-13-15 | Chargers +10 v. Chiefs | Top | 3-10 | Win | 100 | 144 h 28 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on the San Diego Chargers. |
|||||||
12-13-15 | 49ers v. Browns -1 | Top | 10-24 | Win | 100 | 144 h 27 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on the Cleveland Browns. |
|||||||
12-13-15 | Titans +7.5 v. Jets | Top | 8-30 | Loss | -124 | 144 h 26 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on the Tennessee Titans. |
|||||||
12-11-15 | North Dakota State -6 v. North Dakota | Top | 69-67 | Loss | -110 | 31 h 26 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on North Dakota State. |
|||||||
12-09-15 | Bulls +3.5 v. Celtics | Top | 100-105 | Loss | -110 | 28 h 1 m | Show |
This is an 10* ASSASSIN on the Chicago Bulls. |
- Early Lines
- High Limits
- NEW VIP Rewards
- VIP Program
- Mobile Betting
- Crypto
- VIP Program
- Crypto
- Live & Mobile Betting!
- Crypto
- Live & Mobile Betting
- 48 Hour Payouts
- 35% Crypto Bonus
- Live Betting
- Mobile Friendly
Guaranteed Winners or your money back and Free Picks in the NFL football, NBA basketball, MLB baseball, NCAA college football and basketball, Nascar Racing, Arena Football nhl hockey leagues and more.
We are part of the internets Premier Sports Handicappers League with full documentation of all members on this sports betting news and info portal. Free Membership, Join Today and start Winning!
For any resources you could need like sports handicapping odds, handicapping stats, schedules, or handicappers free picks and tips please click on any of the links on the right hand side of this page.