For any resources you could need like sports handicapping odds, handicapping stats, schedules, or handicappers free picks and tips please click on any of the links on the right hand side of this page.
CLICK A CAPPERS NAME TO SEE THEIR PREMIUM DAILY EXPERT PLAYS + PREDICTIONS!
Schedule: NFL | CFB | MLB | NBA | CBB | NHL
WANT FREE SPORTS PICKS to your inbox? | Newsletter Sign-UP!
Date | Match Up | Rating | Score | Result | Profit | Lead Time | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
02-13-16 | Colorado State v. UNLV -7.5 | 80-87 | Loss | -110 | 30 h 30 m | Show | |
This is an 8* BLOWOUT on UNLV. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Classic letdown spot: The Rams picked up a second consecutive victory by beating the Boise State Broncos on Wednesday, but needed double OT to do it, eventually pulling away for the 97-93 win. The victory had some controversy as well, as Boise State’s James Webb III hit a three-pointer before time expired in the first OT, but the officials did not count the shot. The Conference has since reversed the decision and the Broncos are protesting the loss. With the team still thinking about the drama surrounding that exciting contest, there’s no question that this one sets up as classic letdown spot for the visitors. A move in the correct direction: UNLV broke a three-game slide by besting SJSU 64-61 last time out. And it’s the way the Rebels closed which has us confident for this one as UNLV came back from a 37-24 halftime deficit to score 40 points in the second. Revenge: The Rams would beat the Rebels at home in Fort Collins earlier in the season. ATS statistics: Note that Colorado State is just 3-7 ATS after scoring 80 points or more this season, while UNLV is 7-4 ATS vs. good offensive teams which score 77-plus points per contest. The bottom line: There are a bunch of different factors which are all pointing to UNLV as the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-13-16 | Texas v. Iowa State -6 | Top | 75-85 | Win | 100 | 29 h 55 m | Show |
This is a 10* BIG TIGER on Iowa State. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Desperation breeds motivation: Iowa State is ranked 15th in the Nation, but has lost three of its last four. Not only will it be looking to break the slide, but it’ll also be out to avenge a 94-91 OT loss to the Longhorns back on January 12th. Suffice it to say, we believe the determination and focus that the home side plays with today will result in production on the court: "We had great chances to win down the stretch. We were up. We just didn't finish the game. That's the bottom line,” said Cyclones coach Steve Prohm about his team’s recent slide. The numbers don’t lie: Texas has been on quite a role of late, but we feel it is primed for a letdown here finally in facing this revenge minded home side and the numbers back up that assumption as the Longhorns are just 9-13 ATS their last 22 off a loss vs. a conference rival and just 4-5 ATS in their last nine as a road dog in the 3.5 to six points range. ATS statistics: Note that Iowa State has dominated in this spot for bettors this season, going 4-2 ATS after allowing 80 points or more and a perfect 2-0 ATS in trying to revenge a road loss vs. an opponent. The bottom line: All of the factors listed absolutely make IOWA STATE the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-13-16 | Oregon v. Stanford +6 | Top | 72-76 | Win | 100 | 24 h 27 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on Stanford. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Desperation breeds motivation: There is no doubt that the Cardinal will be playing with desperation today, they’ve lost four straight, both SU and ATS, most recently a 62-50 setback to Oregon State on Thursday. Conversely, we absolutely feel that this sets up as a natural letdown spot for the Ducks, who after winning both SU and ATS in six straight games, would finally fall 83-63 at Cal as 1.5 points favs last time out. It’s hard to gain momentum back after losing it and suffice it to say, this one definitely sets up as a classic letdown spot for the visitors in our professional opinion. Revenge: Stanford has lost two straight in the series, both SU and ATS, most recently a 71-58 setback at Oregon on January 10th. ATS statistics: Note that the Cardinal are 17-3 SU the last 20 in this series when playing in front of the home town crowd. The bottom line: It’s not too hard to imagine the 20-5 Ducks coming into this one a bit complacent as they hit a “vanilla” part of their schedule, with a game vs. the hapless Beavers next week and while we won’t be so bold as to predict an outright upset, we will in the end recommend grabbing as many points as you can. Play on STANFORD. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-13-16 | Georgetown +3.5 v. Providence | 72-75 | Win | 100 | 20 h 28 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SUPER-BLOWOUT on Georgetown. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Revenge: After three straight SU losses and five straight ATS setbacks, the Hoyas finally broke though with a 92-67 SU/ATS victory over St. John’s last time out. Georgetown will be looking to string a couple of wins together now and to avenge a 73-69 loss to the Friars on January 30th. Providence has in fact won three-straight games in the series and four of the last five. Classic “look-ahead” spot: It’s not too hard to imagine Providence in some small way looking past 14-11 Georgetown today to its game vs. league leading 21-3 Xavier on Wednesday. ATS statistics: Note that Georgetown is 7-5 ATS vs. conference opponents this year and 6-4 ATS when playing the role of underdog, while Providence is just 5-8 ATS at home and already 0-2 ATS as a home fav of 3.5 to six points. The bottom line: In our professional opinion, this one definitely sets up as a great “spot” bet and while we obviously wouldn’t be completely shocked by an outright upset, we will in the end recommend grabbing as many points as you can. Play on GEORGETOWN. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-13-16 | Northern Iowa +14 v. Wichita State | 53-50 | Win | 100 | 20 h 28 m | Show | |
This is an 8* ASSASSIN on Northern Iowa. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Surging Panthers: While NIU won’t be headed to to the NCAA Tournament with a 15-11 SU overall record (7-6 in the MVC), it’s certainly turned its season around, it enters this one on a five-game win streak, most recently beating Missouri 83-69 on Wednesday. Four players scored in double figures and Northern Iowa has now won eight straight when scoring at least 80 points. Note that defensively, NIU gives up 65.5 a night. Letdown spot: The Shockers are rolling along, they’re 12-1 in conference and it’s just a matter of time until they lock up the regular season title. The team is also coming off a 74-48 win at Drake last Tuesday, its biggest ever victory on its home-court. Revenge: No big surprise that the visitors will be playing with revenge today, they fell 74-55 to the Shockers on January 20th. Wichita State has in fact won eight of the last ten in the series, both SU and ATS. ATS statistics: Note that Northern Iowa is 4-2 ATS this year off a win vs. a conference rival, while Wichita State is just 5-7 ATS this season after allowing 60 points or less. The bottom line: The Panthers are not a push over, they’ve beaten North Carolina and Iowa State. And note, in the loss to the Shockers in January, Wichita State only led by six with about four minutes left to play. While we won’t be so bold as to call for an outright upset, we will in the end recommend grabbing as many points as you can as we look for NORTHERN IOWA to keep this one a lot closer than what the oddsmakers are leading us to believe. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-11-16 | Oregon State v. Stanford -1.5 | 62-50 | Loss | -110 | 33 h 47 m | Show | |
This is an 8* BAIL-OUT BLOWOUT on Stanford. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Desperation breeds motivation: We don’t think the Cardinal will be throwing in the towel on the season, despite losing three in a row, we like the team to come out aggressive tonight. And if history is any precedence, then Stanford has to be liking its chances as it would defeat Oregon State 78-72 in the first meeting of the season. Evenly matched: The Cardinal are just 11-10, while the Beavers are 14-8, but don’t let their records fool you, these team’s numbers are practically identical, as Stanford averages 70.5 PPG while giving up 69.7, while Oregon State averages 71.4 and allows 68.6. ATS statistics: Note that Oregon State is just 1-4 ATS in its last five following an ATS victory and only and just 1-3 ATS off a win vs. a conference rival, while Stanford is already 2-0 ATS this year after three or more consecutive SU losses. The bottom line: The CARDINAL play well at home, we peg them to be the much more motivated side and with the confidence in knowing that they’ve already beaten the Beavers this year, we look for them to find a way to get the job done at the end of the night. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-11-16 | Wizards v. Bucks -1 | Top | 92-99 | Win | 100 | 30 h 54 m | Show |
This is a 10* GAME OF THE MONTH on the Milwaukee Bucks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Revenge: The Bucks fell 106-101 to Washington on January 13th and will be highly motivated to avoid the season series sweep, losing the first three meetings of the year. Momentum: Milwaukee played like a desperate team in its 112-111 win over the Celtics on Tuesday, breaking a stretch of five-straight losses. The Bucks would allow the C’s to battle back from 19 down in the fourth quarter, but were able to finally find a way to pull out the victory. If the team had lost that one, we’d likely be going the other way on this selection, but with the victory, we like Milwaukee to come in focused and confident tonight. ATS statistics: Note that Washington is just 1-3 ATS this year as a road dog of three points or less and only 13-15 ATS vs. poor defensive teams which allow 99-plus points per contest, while Milwaukee is 18-15 ATS this season in trying to revenge a loss vs. an opponent and 13-9 ATS in front of the home town crowd. The bottom line: With the All-Star break looming, we think the visitors get caught looking ahead to that time off, while the hungrier BUCKS take advantage and build off their latest victory. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-11-16 | Connecticut -4.5 v. Temple | 58-63 | Loss | -110 | 29 h 48 m | Show | |
This is an 8* REVENGE DESTRUCTION on Connecticut. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Momentum: The Huskies have won three straight, most recently an 85-67 victory over East Carolina on Sunday. Temple also comes in on a three-game win streak, but now faces a determined and hungry visiting side that is out for redemption. Revenge: The Owls beat the Huskies 55-53 on January 5th at the XL Center in the first meeting of the season. Smothering defensive play: UConn ranks second in the country in allowing the opposition to shoot just .368 from the field. The Huskies also rank in the top ten in free-throw percentage and scoring defense (61.4). ATS statistics: Note that UConn is 4-2 ATS this season after scoring 80 points or more, while Temple is just 3-4 ATS off a victory vs. a conference rival. The bottom line: Both teams are playing at a very high-level right now, but the revenge factor, combined with the nation leading defensive play and these ATS stats do indeed make the HUSKIES the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-10-16 | Nuggets v. Pistons -7.5 | 103-92 | Loss | -105 | 29 h 18 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SUPER-BLOWOUT on the Detroit Pistons. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Revenge motivation: The home side will be looking to avoid its first three-game skid since December, while also out to avenge a loss to the Nuggets in Denver just last month. Letdown/look-ahead spot: Denver has been playing a lot better lately, especially for bettors, covering the spread in eight of its last ten. It had won two in a row SU and seven straight ATS until a 105-104 loss as a 2.5 point favorite in Brooklyn on Monday. It’s hard to gain momentum back after losing it and with eight days off for the All Star break after this contest, there’s no question in our minds that this does indeed set up as a classic letdown/look-ahead spot for the visitors. ATS statistics: Note that Denver is just 1-2 ATS this year off an upset loss as a favorite, while Detroit is 15-12 ATS this season in revenging a loss vs. an opponent. The bottom line: We expect the visitors to check out of this one early and for the hungry PISTONS to find a way to get the job done at the end of the night. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-10-16 | Kings -4 v. 76ers | Top | 114-110 | Push | 0 | 29 h 48 m | Show |
This is a 10* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Sacramento Kings. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: “The Brain” stays: There were reports that coach George Karl was on his way out of Sacramento, but GM Vlade Divac has given him a second chance and with one last opportunity to secure a win after eight losses out of their last nine, we look for the “The Brain” and his team to rise to the occasion. Revenge: The hungry Kings will be eager to atone for a particularly low-spot of their season when they fell 110-105 to the 76ers at home on December 30th. DeMarcus Cousins: Keep your eyes on the big man, he’s averaging 31.0 points and 17.3 boards in his last three vs. Philadelphia. ATS statistics: Note that Sacramento is 5-3 ATS this year after three or more consecutive losses and 4-3 ATS after playing three consecutive road games, while Philadelphia is a horrible 11-13 ATS at home this season and only 2-3 ATS this year as a home dog of 3.5 to six points. The bottom line: We think a motivated and highly focused KINGS team finally comes to play a full four quarters and comfortably pulls away down the stretch for the ATS cover. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-09-16 | Wizards v. Knicks | 111-108 | Loss | -110 | 30 h 51 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the New York Knicks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: New York coaching change: When a struggling team makes a coaching change in the middle of the season, one of two things invariably happens: either the team responds, or nothing changes and it continues to spiral down the proverbial crapper. We think the former will be the case though, at least for tonight as Kurt Rambis will now take the reigns for the first time since the Knicks let go of Derek Fisher. Perfect opponent to get untracked against: New York looks to regain the form which saw it dominate the first month and a half of the season and a date vs. the struggling Wizards is just what the doctor ordered, Washington has dropped eight of 11 while allowing 111.4 PPG. Revenge factor: New York did manage to beat Washington 117-110 on October 31st to snap a seven-game win slide in the series, but the Knicks will still be eager to break a four-game losing streak in the series at Madison Square Garden. ATS statistics: Note that Washington is already 0-3 ATS this season as a road underdog of three points or less and just 5-6 ATS in trying to revenge a home loss vs. an opponent, while New York is 7-5 ATS this year after three or more consecutive SU losses and 11-8 ATS following a non-conference contest. The bottom line: The coaching change, the revenge factor, plenty of strong ATS statistics, all signs do indeed point to the KNICKS as the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-09-16 | Celtics v. Bucks +5.5 | Top | 111-112 | Win | 100 | 30 h 50 m | Show |
This is a 10* EXPRESS on the Milwaukee Bucks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Motivation levels: Boston is rolling, it’s won nine of its last ten, most recently a 128-119 victory over Sacramento on Sunday. That also included a hugely satisfying victory over Cleveland on Friday. The Bucks on the other hand will be playing with extreme desperation as they look to break a season-high five-game slide. Desperation breeds motivation while winning leads to contentedness. Revenge factor: The Bucks play with revenge today, they fell 99-83 at home to Boston on November 10th. Note that Milwaukee has in fact dropped two straight and seven of their last ten to the C’s in front of the home town crowd. Getting healthier: The home side expects a big boost today with the return from OJ Mayo, who has been sitting for 11 games with a hamstring injury (one other players to keep your eyes on today is Bucks’ centre Greg Monroe, who is averaging 20.5 points on 56.3 percent shooting over his last eight games). ATS statistics: Note that Boston is just 3-5 ATS this year after three or more consecutive SU victories, while Milwaukee is 6-1 ATS after three or more consecutive SU losses. The bottom line: The situational, motivational, personnel and trend based factors do all indeed point to the BUCKS as the sharp move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-09-16 | Michigan State v. Purdue -1.5 | Top | 81-82 | Loss | -110 | 29 h 44 m | Show |
This is a 10* BIG-TIGER on Purdue. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Revenge factor: To say this is a “revenge” game would be a bit of an understatement, as MSU has won seven-straight in the series. Rebounding battle: These are a couple of the leagues best on the glass, as MSU leads the country at plus 12.8. Purdue has been dominant down low all year as well and we feel this will play a major factor in the outcome of this contest as the Boilermakers are third in the nation in rebounding differential at plus-11.8 and have been the only team to yet be out rebounded in a game. This negates the Spartans strength and tips the scales in favor of the home side. Even defensively: These teams are also a “wash” defensively, MSU leads the conference in almost every category, while Purdue is right behind in second. ATS statistics: Note that Michigan State is just 2-5 ATS this year vs. good offensive teams which score 77-plus points per contest, while Purdue is 6-4 ATS in the same position. The bottom line: It’s hard to imagine Michigan State “looking past” Purdue today, but with a game vs. Indiana next Saturday, the team sitting just one spot ahead of it in the league standings, it’s definitely not out of the realm of possibility. And combined with the other situational, motivational and trend based factors listed above, all signs do indeed point to the BOILERMAKERS as the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-08-16 | Notre Dame v. Clemson -1.5 | Top | 89-83 | Loss | -115 | 32 h 18 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Clemson. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: A classic letdown spot: The Irish are coming off a huge 80-76 win over North Carolina and suffice it to say, all signs do indeed point to a classic letdown for the visitors. Revenge: Notre Dame is a perfect 3-0 SU and 2-1 ATS in the series dating back to 2014, including an 81-67 victory March 7th, 2015. Hungry home side: The Tigers are coming off a loss to Virginia Tech and will be hungry to get back into the win column and finally break their run of futility to the Irish (note that Clemson does have good conference wins over Duke, Miami and Louisville this year). ATS statistics: Note that Notre Dame is just 1-3 ATS this year when playing with one or less days rest and just 3-7 ATS after scoring 80 points or more, while Clemson is 9-2 ATS this season vs. the conference and 2-0 ATS when playing with one or less days rest. The bottom line: Behind their trademark tough defensive play, we look for the TIGERS to find a way to get the job done at the end of the night. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-08-16 | Bulls +4.5 v. Hornets | Top | 91-108 | Loss | -110 | 30 h 25 m | Show |
This is a 10* REVENGE DESTRUCTION on the Chicago Bulls. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different basic factors: Revenge: Charlotte has won two of three over Chicago, most recently a 102-96 victory on December 5th. Derek Rose: Chicago star Jimmy Butler won’t be playing in this one, but D-Rose has picked up the slack by averaging 19.5 points and 9.5 assists the last two games. ATS statistics: This is in fact a spot in which the Bulls have dominated in for bettors, going 12-8 ATS last 20 after allowing 105 points or more, while Charlotte has struggled in this spot by going just 14-17 ATS vs. good offensive teams which score 99-plus points per contest and just 6-10 ATS after scoring 105 points or more. The bottom line: With a five game road trip which starts on Wednesday, we think the home side comes into this one a bit complacent and despite being down a key player, we ultimately feel that the level of desperation in which the BULLS play with today will prove to be the difference. Play on CHICAGO. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-07-16 | Nuggets v. Knicks -4 | 101-96 | Loss | -110 | 3 h 2 m | Show | |
This is an 8* ASSASSIN on the New York Knicks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Desperation breeds motivation: The home side will be the hungrier team today in our opinion, it’s lost four straight and now sits 11th place in the Eastern Conference. Carmelo Anthony: How Melo goes, so go the Knicks. New York is 0-7 in games he’s missed, but he’s expected to be in the lineup today. Classic letdown/look-ahead spot: The Nuggets have been trading wins and losses over their last six games and come in off an extremely satisfying come from behind 115-110 victory over Chicago on Friday. With a game tomorrow night in Brooklyn, it’s not too hard to imagine the visitors coming into this one a bit complacent. ATS statistics: Note that Denver is just 10-11 ATS this season after scoring 105 points or more, while New York is 6-4 ATS after three or more consecutive losses, 5-3 ATS after scoring 85 points or less, 21-14 ATS vs. good offensive teams which average 99-plus points per contest and interestingly, 5-1 ATS vs. the Northwest division. The bottom line: We feel there are enough situational and trend based factors to pull the trigger on the determined home side, play on the KNICKS. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-06-16 | Florida State v. Wake Forest +4 | Top | 91-71 | Loss | -110 | 20 h 15 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Wake Forest. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Desperation breeds motivation: The Demon Deacons will desperately be trying to snap a season-long seven-game losing streak before hitting the road for three-straight away from friendly confines. Suffice it to say, we expect a big time effort from the home side this afternoon. Note though that the Deac’s strength of schedule is ranked No. 1 nationally in the Sagarin Ratings and the ESPN BPI, having already played nine ranked opponents. Classic look ahead spot: FSU next plays Syracuse next week, a team which it lost to twice last year. Revenge factor: Wake plays with revenge after falling 82-76 to the Seminoles on January 28th, 2015. Home court advantage: The Deacons are 14-6 SU their last 20 vs. FSU in front of the home town crowd. The bottom line: The situation and the trends do indeed point to WAKE FOREST as the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-05-16 | Bucks +7.5 v. Jazz | Top | 81-84 | Win | 100 | 31 h 48 m | Show |
This is a 10* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Milwaukee Bucks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Letdown/look-ahead spot: We feel this sets up as a classic spot bet against the Jazz, they’ve won four straight, but had to hold on for dear life in an 85-81 win over Denver on Wednesday, unable to cover the 8-point spread. And with a three game road trip starting tomorrow night in Phoenix, it’s definitely not too hard to imagine the home side looking past their Eastern Conference opponent this evening. Revenge: The Bucks have dropped 13 straight in Utah. Desperation breeds motivation: While the Jazz are flying high, the Bucks come in having lost four straight and five in a row on the road. There’s no question in our minds who will be the more motivated side in this one. ATS statistics: Note that Milwaukee is 5-1 ATS vs. Northwest division opponents this season and 5-1 ATS after three or more consecutive SU losses, while Utah is only 1-3 ATS after scoring 85 points or less and just 2-4 ATS after playing three consecutive home games. The bottom line: While we wouldn’t be shocked by an outright upset, we will in the end recommend grabbing as many points as you can as we look for the BUCKS to risk life and limb to secure a victory today and expect them to at the very least, take this one down to the wire and comfortably sneak in through the back door down the stretch. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-05-16 | Dartmouth v. Pennsylvania -2 | Top | 64-71 | Win | 100 | 28 h 42 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Pennsylvania. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Desperation breeds motivation: The Quakers are looking to end a four-game slide and to take advantage of a Big Green team which had won three in a row before back to back setbacks at the hands of Columbia and Cornell. Moving in the right direction: Pennsylvania will desperately be trying to secure its first conference win, but it’s come very close, surrounding a blowout loss to Yale, the Quakers would drop an OT game vs. Princeton on January 9th, while also falling at Brown 89-83 last weekend: “Against Brown, I think we did a lot of good things for long stretches,” head coach Steve Donahue assessed. “We played solid offense. The guys are getting better, there’s good growth, they’re all in, they keep competing. Now we just gotta put it together for 40 minutes,. One thing that really hurt us was [our shooting] at the foul line.” ATS statistics: Note that Darmouth is just 1-5 ATS in its last six on the road and only 6-17-1 ATS in its last 24 games following a SU loss, while Pennsylvania is 5-2 ATS its last seven in front of the home town crowd and 6-2 ATS in its last eight at home vs. teams with losing road records. The bottom line: Despite injuries, the QUAKERS are definitely knocking on the door for their first conference victory, note that Big Green has won just four games at the Palestra since 1959. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-03-16 | Oklahoma State v. Texas Tech -6 | Top | 61-63 | Loss | -110 | 31 h 30 m | Show |
This is a 10* BIG TIGER on Texas Tech. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Motivation levels: We’ll argue that Texas Tech will be the much more motivated team tonight, while the Red Raiders are still 12-8 and 8th overall in the Big 12, they come into this one having lost three straight. Oklahoma State on the other hand is 11-10 and 9th in the conference, but has won two of its last four, most recently a very satisfying 74-63 win over Auburn. ATS statistics: The Red Raiders are 7-3 ATS in their last ten at home and 7-1 ATS in their last eight home games vs. a team with a losing road record, while the Cowboys are just 3-6 ATS after scoring 80 points or more and only 4-8 ATS vs. teams with winning records. The bottom line: The situation and the trends both suggest that TEXAS TECH is indeed the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-03-16 | Heat v. Mavs -4 | Top | 93-90 | Loss | -110 | 10 h 15 m | Show |
This is a 10* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Dallas Mavericks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Revenge factor: Dallas suffered a 106-82 setback to the Heat on New Years Day, a loss which still represents the team’s second lowest point total of the season. The Mavericks have in fact lost eight of the last nine in the series. Letdown spot: It’s hard to gain back momentum and after having their four-game win streak halted in a 115-102 loss at Houston just last night, suffice it to say we think the Heat come in with “heavy legs” this evening. ATS statistics: Note that Miami is just 4-5 ATS in its last nine when playing on back-to-back days and just 2-6 ATS after allowing 105 points or more, while Dallas is 14-7 ATS after allowing 105 points or more and 12-10 ATS this season in trying to revenge a loss vs. an opponent. The bottom line: Both teams have injury concerns, so that area is a “wash,” DALLAS though clearly has the situational, motivational and trend based factors all working in its favor today. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-03-16 | Magic +13.5 v. Thunder | Top | 114-117 | Win | 100 | 31 h 5 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on the Orlando Magic. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Classic letdown/look-ahead spot: This is as big as it gets with this angle, the Thunder have won nine of their last ten, including four straight and after playing the lowly Eastern Conference Magic tonight, have a battle at defending champion Golden State on Saturday. Suffice it to say, it’s obviously not too hard to imagine OKC looking past Orlando this evening. Revenge: The Magic fell 139-136 in double OT at home to the Thunder on November 30th. Orlando has also lost six straight in OKC. Road warriors: The Magic are 10-7 SU against the Western conference with six of those setbacks decided by six points or less, including three in the extra frame. ATS statistics: Note that Orlando is 12-4 ATS in non-conference game this year, while OKC is just 8-13 ATS in non-conference contests and only 7-18 ATS vs. teams with losing records. The bottom line: We won’t be so bold as to call for an outright upset, but with the situational and trend based factors working in their favor, we look for the MAGIC to keep this one a lot closer than what the oddsmakers are leading us to believe. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-03-16 | Notre Dame v. Miami (Fla) -7 | Top | 70-79 | Win | 100 | 30 h 41 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Miami Florida. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Revenge factor: ND took both games vs. Miami last year. Home court advantage: The Hurricanes have won eight straight at home. It’s averaged a 12.9 points margin in its last four ACC home games. Experience advantage: Notre Dame had an experience edge last year, but not so this season as Miami boasts a starting lineup of seniors. Classic lookahead spot: It’s hard not to imagine the Fighting Irish not getting caught looking ahead to their game at home vs. UNC on Saturday. ATS statistics: Note that Notre Dame is just 1-2 ATS as an underdog this year, while Miami is 11-7 ATS as the favorite and 7-3 ATS in front of the home town crowd. The bottom line: The situational, motivational and trend based factors do all indeed point to MIAMI as the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-01-16 | North Carolina v. Louisville -2 | Top | 65-71 | Win | 100 | 28 h 28 m | Show |
This is a 10* ACC GAME OF THE MONTH on Louisville. |
|||||||
01-31-16 | Wolves +7.5 v. Blazers | 93-96 | Win | 100 | 31 h 53 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Minnesota Timberwolves. |
|||||||
01-31-16 | Celtics v. Magic +3 | 114-119 | Win | 100 | 28 h 53 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Orlando Magic. |
|||||||
01-31-16 | Hawks +1 v. Heat | 87-105 | Loss | -105 | 8 h 3 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Atlanta Hawks. |
|||||||
01-30-16 | Kings +3 v. Grizzlies | Top | 117-121 | Loss | -105 | 27 h 13 m | Show |
This is a 10* REVENGE ASSASSIN on the Sacramento Kings. |
|||||||
01-30-16 | Kentucky v. Kansas -6 | Top | 84-90 | Push | 0 | 26 h 16 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on Kansas. |
|||||||
01-30-16 | Washington v. USC -7 | Top | 88-98 | Win | 100 | 22 h 6 m | Show |
This is a 10* Pac-12 ASSASSIN on USC. |
|||||||
01-30-16 | Fordham +2.5 v. Massachusetts | Top | 78-72 | Win | 100 | 19 h 7 m | Show |
This is a 10* MID-MAJOR MAULING on Fordham. |
|||||||
01-29-16 | Pennsylvania +14 v. Yale | Top | 58-81 | Loss | -110 | 28 h 26 m | Show |
This is a 10* ART OF WAR on Pennsylvania. |
|||||||
01-29-16 | Princeton v. Brown +8 | Top | 83-59 | Loss | -110 | 27 h 17 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Brown. |
|||||||
01-28-16 | Niagara v. Marist -5 | 69-66 | Loss | -105 | 11 h 2 m | Show | |
This is an 8* MONEY-LINE play on Marist. |
|||||||
01-27-16 | Hornets v. Jazz -5.5 | Top | 73-102 | Win | 100 | 28 h 19 m | Show |
This is a 10* REVENGE ASSASSIN on the Utah Jazz. |
|||||||
01-27-16 | DePaul v. Butler -13.5 | Top | 53-67 | Win | 100 | 27 h 45 m | Show |
This is a 10* MID-MAJOR MAULING on Butler. |
|||||||
01-26-16 | Suns +2.5 v. 76ers | 103-113 | Loss | -110 | 27 h 26 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Phoenix Suns. |
|||||||
01-25-16 | Hawks -4.5 v. Nuggets | 119-105 | Win | 100 | 30 h 4 m | Show | |
This is an 8* COAST-TO-COAST EXPRESS on the Atlanta Hawks. |
|||||||
01-25-16 | Kansas +1 v. Iowa State | Top | 72-85 | Loss | -105 | 30 h 57 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on Kansas. |
|||||||
01-25-16 | Detroit +7 v. Green Bay | Top | 108-115 | Push | 0 | 29 h 58 m | Show |
This is a 10* Horizon League GAME OF THE YEAR on Detroit. |
|||||||
01-23-16 | Drake +6 v. Loyola-Chicago | 63-68 | Win | 100 | 22 h 37 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on Drake. |
|||||||
01-23-16 | Marshall v. Old Dominion -6.5 | 78-75 | Loss | -110 | 22 h 37 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on Old Dominion. |
|||||||
01-23-16 | Fresno State v. Air Force +5.5 | 56-55 | Win | 100 | 22 h 37 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on Air Force. |
|||||||
01-22-16 | Bucks v. Rockets -2.5 | 98-102 | Win | 100 | 26 h 38 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Houston Rockets. |
|||||||
01-22-16 | Heat +9.5 v. Raptors | 81-101 | Loss | -100 | 10 h 49 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Miami Heat. |
|||||||
01-22-16 | Toledo v. Northern Illinois | Top | 49-58 | Loss | -110 | 24 h 3 m | Show |
This is a 10* MAC GAME OF THE WEEK on Toledo. |
|||||||
01-21-16 | Kentucky -1 v. Arkansas | Top | 80-66 | Win | 100 | 27 h 11 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on Kentucky. |
|||||||
01-19-16 | Bucks v. Heat -6 | 91-79 | Loss | -110 | 30 h 13 m | Show | |
This is an 8* EAST-COAST ASSASSIN on the Miami Heat. |
|||||||
01-18-16 | Warriors v. Cavs -1 | Top | 132-98 | Loss | -110 | 30 h 26 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on the Cleveland Cavaliers. |
|||||||
01-18-16 | Syracuse v. Duke -11.5 | Top | 64-62 | Loss | -110 | 29 h 20 m | Show |
This is a 10* ART OF WAR on Duke. |
|||||||
01-18-16 | Bulls +2 v. Pistons | 111-101 | Win | 100 | 26 h 57 m | Show | |
This is an 8* ASSASSIN on the Chicago Bulls. |
|||||||
01-16-16 | Warriors v. Pistons +8 | 95-113 | Win | 100 | 30 h 34 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Detroit Pistons. |
|||||||
01-15-16 | Heat -3 v. Nuggets | Top | 98-95 | Push | 0 | 32 h 14 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on the Miami Heat. |
|||||||
01-15-16 | George Washington v. Dayton -5 | Top | 70-77 | Win | 100 | 25 h 56 m | Show |
This is a 10* BIG TIGER on Dayton. |
|||||||
01-14-16 | California v. Stanford +2.5 | Top | 71-77 | Win | 100 | 32 h 11 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Stanford. |
|||||||
01-13-16 | Oklahoma v. Oklahoma State +8.5 | Top | 74-72 | Win | 100 | 29 h 27 m | Show |
This is a 10* play on OKLAHOMA STATE. |
|||||||
01-13-16 | Knicks v. Nets +4 | 104-110 | Win | 100 | 10 h 9 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Brooklyn Nets. |
|||||||
01-13-16 | Hawks v. Hornets +2.5 | Top | 84-107 | Win | 100 | 28 h 33 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on the Charlotte Hornets. |
|||||||
01-12-16 | Thunder v. Wolves +9.5 | 101-96 | Win | 100 | 29 h 1 m | Show | |
This is an 8* EXPRESS on the Minnesota Timberwolves. |
|||||||
01-12-16 | Celtics -1 v. Knicks | 114-120 | Loss | -115 | 28 h 22 m | Show | |
This is an 8* EXPRESS on the Boston Celtics. |
|||||||
01-11-16 | Spurs v. Nets +12.5 | Top | 106-79 | Loss | -110 | 30 h 18 m | Show |
This is a 10* ART OF WAR on the Brooklyn Nets. |
|||||||
01-10-16 | Mavs v. Wolves +4 | 93-87 | Loss | -100 | 23 h 41 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Minnesota Timberwolves. |
|||||||
01-09-16 | Warriors v. Kings +7.5 | Top | 128-116 | Loss | -110 | 31 h 37 m | Show |
This is an 8* play on the LA Kings. |
|||||||
01-09-16 | Arizona State +5.5 v. UCLA | Top | 74-81 | Loss | -110 | 25 h 5 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on Arizona State. |
|||||||
01-09-16 | Texas A&M v. Tennessee +5.5 | Top | 92-88 | Win | 100 | 21 h 15 m | Show |
This is a 10* SUPER-BLOWOUT on Tennessee. |
|||||||
01-09-16 | DePaul +10 v. Georgetown | Top | 63-74 | Loss | -110 | 20 h 16 m | Show |
This is a 10* ART OF WAR on DePaul. |
|||||||
01-08-16 | Mavs v. Bucks +2.5 | 95-96 | Win | 100 | 30 h 18 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Milwaukee Bucks. |
|||||||
01-08-16 | Raptors v. Wizards +1.5 | 97-88 | Loss | -110 | 29 h 19 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Washington Wizards. |
|||||||
01-08-16 | Western Michigan +13 v. Akron | Top | 53-62 | Win | 100 | 31 h 30 m | Show |
This is a 10* BIG TIGER on Western Michigan. |
|||||||
01-07-16 | Arizona v. UCLA +3 | Top | 84-87 | Win | 100 | 30 h 23 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on UCLA. |
|||||||
01-07-16 | Jazz v. Rockets -9 | Top | 94-103 | Push | 0 | 29 h 24 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on the Houston Rockets. |
|||||||
01-07-16 | Florida Atlantic +9 v. Marshall | Top | 67-90 | Loss | -110 | 28 h 19 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on Florida Atlantic. |
|||||||
01-06-16 | Stanford v. Oregon State -6 | 78-72 | Loss | -115 | 32 h 24 m | Show | |
This is an 8* BAIL-OUT BLOWOUT on Oregon State. |
|||||||
01-06-16 | La Salle +11 v. Fordham | Top | 61-66 | Win | 100 | 28 h 25 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on La Salle. |
|||||||
01-05-16 | Marquette +9 v. Providence | Top | 65-64 | Win | 100 | 29 h 5 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Marquette. |
|||||||
01-04-16 | Hornets +9.5 v. Warriors | 101-111 | Loss | -110 | 12 h 45 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Charlotte Hornets. |
|||||||
01-04-16 | Celtics -5.5 v. Nets | 103-94 | Win | 100 | 30 h 24 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Boston Celtics. |
|||||||
01-03-16 | Suns v. Lakers +1 | Top | 77-97 | Win | 100 | 30 h 17 m | Show |
This is a 10* GAME OF THE MONTH on the LA Lakers. |
|||||||
01-02-16 | Gonzaga v. San Francisco +12 | Top | 102-94 | Win | 100 | 31 h 37 m | Show |
This is a 10* BAIL-OUT BLOWOUT on San Francisco. |
|||||||
01-02-16 | Suns v. Kings -6.5 | Top | 119-142 | Win | 100 | 7 h 55 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on the Sacramento Kings. |
|||||||
01-02-16 | Penn State +11 v. Michigan | 56-79 | Loss | -110 | 19 h 18 m | Show | |
This is an 8* REVENGE ROUT on Penn State. |
|||||||
12-29-15 | St. Louis +14 v. Kansas State | Top | 47-75 | Loss | -110 | 30 h 50 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Saint Louis. |
|||||||
12-28-15 | IUPU-Indianapolis +23 v. Butler | Top | 54-92 | Loss | -110 | 29 h 11 m | Show |
This is a 10* GAME OF THE WEEK on IUPUI. |
|||||||
12-27-15 | Texas Southern +17 v. Syracuse | Top | 67-80 | Win | 100 | 25 h 7 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Texas Southern. |
|||||||
12-23-15 | Bowling Green v. Cleveland State -4.5 | 62-47 | Loss | -110 | 18 h 28 m | Show | |
This is an 8* REVENGE ROUT on Cleveland State. |
|||||||
12-22-15 | Grizzlies v. 76ers +9 | 104-90 | Loss | -110 | 29 h 49 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Philadelphia 76ers. |
|||||||
12-22-15 | South Florida +16 v. Seton Hall | Top | 49-66 | Loss | -110 | 24 h 59 m | Show |
This is a 10* ART OF WAR on South Florida. |
|||||||
12-21-15 | San Francisco +17.5 v. St. Mary's | Top | 52-74 | Loss | -110 | 33 h 20 m | Show |
This is a 10* GAME OF THE WEEK on San Francisco. |
|||||||
12-21-15 | Pacers +8.5 v. Spurs | 92-106 | Loss | -110 | 31 h 56 m | Show | |
This is an 8* EXPRESS on the Indiana Pacers. |
|||||||
12-21-15 | Wolves v. Celtics -8 | 99-113 | Win | 100 | 30 h 57 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Boston Celtics. |
|||||||
12-20-15 | 76ers +16.5 v. Cavs | 86-108 | Loss | -110 | 26 h 12 m | Show | |
This is an 8* ASSASSIN on the Philadelphia 76ers. |
|||||||
12-19-15 | Hornets v. Wizards +1 | 101-109 | Win | 100 | 10 h 58 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Washington Wizards. |
|||||||
12-19-15 | Kentucky -10 v. Ohio State | Top | 67-74 | Loss | -110 | 23 h 18 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on Kentucky. |
|||||||
12-19-15 | Michigan State v. Northeastern +9 | 78-58 | Loss | -115 | 20 h 19 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on Northeastern. |
|||||||
12-18-15 | Nuggets v. Jazz -5 | 88-97 | Win | 100 | 29 h 34 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Utah Jazz. |
|||||||
12-18-15 | Nets +11 v. Pacers | 97-104 | Win | 100 | 27 h 34 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Brooklyn Nets. |
|||||||
12-18-15 | Knicks v. 76ers +6.5 | 107-97 | Loss | -100 | 27 h 34 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Philadelphia 76ers. |
|||||||
12-16-15 | Northern Arizona +24 v. Arizona | Top | 37-92 | Loss | -110 | 32 h 10 m | Show |
This is a 10* RED DRAGON on Northern Arizona. |
|||||||
12-15-15 | Bucks v. Lakers +4 | 95-113 | Win | 100 | 32 h 26 m | Show | |
This is an 8* ASSASSIN on the LA Lakers. |
|||||||
12-15-15 | Appalachian State +20 v. Texas | 55-67 | Win | 100 | 30 h 50 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on Appalachian State. |
- Early Lines
- High Limits
- NEW VIP Rewards
- VIP Program
- Mobile Betting
- Crypto
- VIP Program
- Crypto
- Live & Mobile Betting!
- Crypto
- Live & Mobile Betting
- 48 Hour Payouts
- 35% Crypto Bonus
- Live Betting
- Mobile Friendly
Guaranteed Winners or your money back and Free Picks in the NFL football, NBA basketball, MLB baseball, NCAA college football and basketball, Nascar Racing, Arena Football nhl hockey leagues and more.
We are part of the internets Premier Sports Handicappers League with full documentation of all members on this sports betting news and info portal. Free Membership, Join Today and start Winning!
For any resources you could need like sports handicapping odds, handicapping stats, schedules, or handicappers free picks and tips please click on any of the links on the right hand side of this page.