For any resources you could need like sports handicapping odds, handicapping stats, schedules, or handicappers free picks and tips please click on any of the links on the right hand side of this page.
CLICK A CAPPERS NAME TO SEE THEIR PREMIUM DAILY EXPERT PLAYS + PREDICTIONS!
Schedule: NFL | CFB | MLB | NBA | CBB | NHL
WANT FREE SPORTS PICKS to your inbox? | Newsletter Sign-UP!
Date | Match Up | Rating | Score | Result | Profit | Lead Time | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
02-25-16 | Hurricanes -129 v. Maple Leafs | 1-3 | Loss | -129 | 26 h 21 m | Show | |
This is an 8* EAST-COAST EXPRESS on the Carolina Hurricanes. We don't subscribe to any single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Surging visitors: The Hurricanes come into this one playing their best hockey of the season, they just beat Philadelphia 3-1 on Tuesday and are 5-2-2 over a span which has seen them total 27 goals. Superior goaltending: Carolina net minder Cam Ward is 9-4-4 with a 1.84 GAA and .930 save percentage dating back to December 18th. Note that Ward has been particularly dominant vs. the Leafs throughout his career as well, limiting them to a goal in his last three match-ups as part of a 7-2-1 stretch with a 1.68 GAA and .941 save percentage. Recent history: The Hurricanes are 22-7-2 since losing three of four to Toronto back in 2006. Over a 5-0-1 stretch in the series, Carolina has outscored the Leafs 18-5. And that’s bad news for a Toronto team which has been shelled for 36 goals during a 1-6-1 span. Brutal goaltending: The Leafs’ Jonathan Bernier is winless over a seven start stretch, going 0-5-0 with a horrible 3.92 GAA and .872 save percentage. The bottom line: No need to overanalyze this one in our opinion, this is the very definition of “great line value.” Play on CAROLINA. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-23-16 | Blue Jackets v. Red Wings -189 | 1-2 | Win | 100 | 9 h 47 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Detroit Red Wings. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based entirely on strong and relevant ATS statistics: Note that Columbus is just 7-17 (-10.1 units) this year after allowing four goals or more and only 6-8 (-1.3 units) when playing on back-to-back days, while Detroit is 4-2 (+2.4 units) this season after three or more consecutive losses. The bottom line: It’s a perfect spot wager, off their big win just last night we look for the Jackets to throw in the white towel early and for the hungry and desperate WINGS to find a way to get the job done at the end of the night. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-21-16 | Avalanche v. Canucks -110 | Top | 1-5 | Win | 100 | 31 h 9 m | Show |
This is a 10* NHL GAME OF THE WEEK on the Vancouver Canucks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Desperation breeds motivation: The Canucks haven’t been eliminated from postseason contention yet despite having won only twice in their last ten games overall, including six straight in front of the home town crowd. Suffice it to say, it’s going to be all hands on deck for the home side today as it looks to break the string of futility, it’s first game of a five game home stand: "It's going to be huge for us to turn this around," said Canucks rookie Jake Virtanen last night. "We're obviously going to have to step up as a team and the younger guys are going to have to step up and the older guys are going to have to keep on playing hard." Classic letdown spot: No need to overanalyze this angle, the Avs are coming off a hard-fought 3-2 win in Edmonton just last night. Goaltenders a “wash”: Neither team has an advantage in net, the Canucks goaltending has been atrocious during the slide, but note that despite a 1-5-2 record since January 19th, Vancouver starter Ryan Miler has posted a highly respectable 2.49 GAA in the process. Avs’ goalie Semyon Varlamov has a 3.74 GAA over his last three vs. Vancouver. The bottom line: The value is to good to turn down in this one when considering the strong factors listed above, play on the CANUCKS. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-19-16 | Canucks v. Flames -140 | Top | 2-5 | Win | 100 | 32 h 50 m | Show |
This is a 10* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Calgary Flames. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on what we feel to be a couple of key factors: Both teams struggling mightily, BUT: Both teams are struggling to get victories. The Flames also learned that starting goaltender Karri Ramo is lost for the season due to injury. Vancouver’s goaltending issues aren’t much better with both starter and backup struggling. So with each team continuing to flounder, where’s the advantage here? The difference in our minds is clearly on the offensive end of the ice, where the Flames have averaged at least 3.5 goals over their last six games, compared to the Canucks 1.8 over their last eight. ATS statistics: Note that Vancouver is just 5-6 (-3 units) this season after playing three consecutive home games, while Calgary is 4-2 (+2.4 units) after playing to three or more consecutive losses. The bottom line: Vancouver played and lost just last night, so we definitely believe fatigue will be a factor in this one. All signs do indeed point to the FLAMES as the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-18-16 | Ducks -140 v. Canucks | 5-2 | Win | 100 | 31 h 21 m | Show | |
This is a 6* play on the Anaheim Ducks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Momentum: After a slow start to the year, Anaheim is now 29-19-8. The Ducks have been surging on the road as well, they’ll be looking for a season high fourth-straight road win, while handing the Canucks their first six-game home losing skid in seven years: "We've been putting some good wins together," said Ducks’ goaltender Frederik Andersen, who most recently made 24 saves to help his team improve to 9-1-3 in its last 13 away from home. "We've been taking good strides toward being a top team in this division." The Ducks have averaged 4.1 goals during a 7-1-1 road stretch, going five for ten on the power play in their last three games. Revenge: The Ducks get a golden chance today to avenge dual 2-1 shootout losses to the Canucks this season. Inept homeside: Vancouver has totalled just seven goals during an 0-4-1 stretch in front of the home town crowd. ATS statistics: Note that Anaheim is 57-37 (+12.4 units) the last three seasons in trying to revenge a loss vs. an opponent, while Vancouver is just 8-17 (-8.2 units) this season vs. teams with winning records. The bottom line: No need to overanalyze this one in our opinion, ANAHEIM comes in focused and kicks this struggling Canucks team while it’s down. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-18-16 | Wild v. Oilers -108 | 5-2 | Loss | -108 | 11 h 3 m | Show | |
This is a 6* play on the Edmonton Oilers. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Classic letdown spot: Following a dismal 1-11-2 stretch, the Wild would release coach Mike Yeo and hire Jon Torchetti in his place. The Wild have responded with two straight big road wins, a 5-2 victory in Vancouver and then a a 5-3 win in Calgary on Wednesday. Note that prior to the win over the Canucks, Minnesota hadn’t scored more than three goals in a game since early January, a 2-11-3 skid in which it averaged a paltry 1.87 GPG with a brutal 14.9 percent power play. Revenge factor: To say this is a “revenge” game for the Oilers would be a bit of an understatement as not only did the Wild open the season series with a 4-3 home win back on October 27th, but Minnesota has also gone 9-2-1 the last 12 in the series, which includes five victories in as many tries in Edmonton. ATS statistics: Note that Minnesota is already just 3-7 (-3.7 units) this season when playing on back-to-back days. The bottom line: It’s been a frustrating stretch for Edmonton, but the stars have aligned for the young team, we’re expecting to see some much more disciplined play and for the OILERS to find a way to get the job done once the final horn blares. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-18-16 | Jets v. Lightning -150 | 5-6 | Win | 100 | 29 h 2 m | Show | |
This is a 6* play on the Tampa Bay Lightning. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Desperation breeds motivation: Winnipeg is just 25-28-3 on the year and while it still has designs at one last playoff push, it’s the Lightning which figure to come into this one the more motivated. At 30-22-4, Tampa is now outside of the playoff picture looking in and because of this, we definitely expect it to come in focused on the task at hand as it looks to avoid a fifth loss in its last six games. After winning nine-straight at home, the Bolts have dropped two in a row at Amalie Arena: "We've got 26 games left and they're all going to be important," said goaltender Ben Bishop. "It's gut-check time." Crash and burn Jets: Winnipeg is near the bottom of the Western Conference and hasn’t really shown any signs of life, it’s managed just five non-shootout goals while splitting its last four and was held to eight of its 21 shots in the first two periods of Tuesday’s 2-1 setback at Carolina. Note that the Jets are 1 for 20 on the power play in four games; they’re also a unit which ranks near the bottom of the NHL in penalty-kill percentage. ATS statistics: Note that Winnipeg is just 11-13 (-1.2 units) this season in trying to revenge a loss vs. an opponent, while Tampa Bay is 9-5 (+2.9 units) this year after allowing four goals or more in its previous contest. The bottom line: When taking into account these strong situational and trend based factors working in favor of the home side, in our professional opinion this is indeed the very definition of “great line value.” Play on the LIGHTNING. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-16-16 | Stars v. Blues -125 | 1-2 | Win | 100 | 10 h 57 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on St. Louis Blues. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a couple of really basic factors: Revenge: While St. Louis has in fact taken two of three from the Stars this year, the Blues would lose the last one, a 3-0 setback at Dallas on December 27th. Letdown spot: After winning four straight, including a 3-2 OT victory at Nashville just last night, there’s no question that in some small way this sets up as a bit of a letdown spot of the visitors. ATS statistics: Note that Dallas is a poor 5-6 (-4.4 units) already this season after a three game unbeaten streak, while St. Louis is 15-11 (+4.1 units) vs. teams with winning records. The bottom line: No need to overanalyze this one, we think the Stars finally run out of gas tonight and the BLUES step up and take advantage. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-13-16 | Coyotes v. Sharks -185 | 1-4 | Win | 100 | 12 h 9 m | Show | |
This is a 5* play on the San Jose Sharks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a couple of basic factors: Scheduling: Arizona broke a five-game slide with a 4-1 win over Calgary just last night. Suffice it to say, this one definitely sets up as a letdown spot in our opinion. San Jose has had a night off to brood over a 6-5 shootout loss to those very Flames and will be eager to return to the winners circle and take advantage of this favorable situation. ATS statistics: Note that Arizona is just 4-7 (-1.9 units) when playing on back-to-back days this year, while San Jose is 12-9 (+2.4 units) after allowing four goals or more. The bottom line: A tired and contented Coyotes team is going to throw in the white flag early and with a couple of key factors working in their favor, all signs do indeed point to the SHARKS as the sharp move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-13-16 | Maple Leafs v. Canucks -170 | 5-2 | Loss | -170 | 29 h 31 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Vancouver Canucks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Revenge: The Canucks will be eager to build off their two straight road victories and to avenge a 4-2 setback to Toronto on November 11th. Motivation: Vancouver will also be looking to snap a three-game slide in front of the home town crowd. With the two game win surge, the Canucks are now just outside of a playoff spot in the Western Conference: "Every game is do or die for us," Canucks’ defenseman Alex Biega confirmed last night. "Every point really matters. For the most part, that's playoff-type of hockey." If history is any precedence: Vancouver definitely has to be feeling confident in this spot, it hasn’t lost at home to the Maple Leafs since 2003, while outscoring them 26-7 in the last six there. Plummeting Leafs: Toronto comes in with zero momentum, it’s 0-3-0 on its current five-game road trip after falling 5-2 to Edmonton on Thursday. The Leafs have given up 15 goals so far on the swing. Expected starter Jonathan Bernier has posted a deplorable 3.82 GAA while losing four straight road starts. ATS statistics: Note that Toronto is 6-13 (-6.2 units) this year after allowing four goals or more, while Vancouver is 13-10 (+3.7 units) in revenging a loss vs. an opponent. The bottom line: There’s no reason for VANCOUVER to look past the lowly Leafs today, this is a do or die scenario and all signs do indeed point to a victory of the rocking-chair variety. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-13-16 | Predators v. Panthers -123 | 5-0 | Loss | -123 | 9 h 39 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Florida Panthers. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a what we feel to be two important factors: Scheduling: Both teams played and lost just last night. Nashville’s setback was definitely the more disappointing though as it would cough up a late lead to Tampa Bay and then eventually fall 4-3 in OT. As we approach the final stretch of the season, a back to back game naturally favors the home side at this time of year as players are able to sleep in their own beds and be in familiar surroundings. ATS statistics: Note that Nashville is already 1-6 (-6.3 units) when playing on back-to-back days this season, while Florida is 6-4 (+2.5 units) in the same position. The bottom line: Backed by a great situational factor and some extremely strong and relevant trends, all signs do indeed point to the PANTHERS as the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-06-16 | Flames v. Canucks -127 | 4-1 | Loss | -127 | 33 h 38 m | Show | |
This is an 8* EXPRESS on the Vancouver Canucks. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. No need to overanalyze this one in our opinion, this selection is based on a few basic factors: Scheduling: The Flames played the Blue Jackets just last night. Revenge: Vancouver lost 3-2 in OT to Calgary on November 10th. The bottom line: Vancouver will be desperate to break a three game slide (note that the Canucks have lost each game by a single goal) and to avenge the earlier loss by taking advantage of this tired Flames team which we feel will come in with “heavy legs.” There’s no question that the price is right in this one, lay it with confidence on VANCOUVER. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-05-16 | Blue Jackets v. Flames -160 | 2-1 | Loss | -160 | 31 h 36 m | Show | |
This is an 8* MID-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Calgary Flames. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Scheduling: No need to overanalyze this one, the Jackets just played and won a 2-1 shootout in Vancouver just last night, there’s no question that this one sets up as a classic letdown spot after that extremely satisfying victory. Revenge: The Flames will be especially motivated here to build off their 4-1 win over Carolina to open the second half to avenge the fact that Columbus is 4-1-0 in its last five visits to Calgary. The bottom line: We think the league-worst Jackets come in flat footed and the FLAMES take full advantage. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-04-16 | Flyers v. Predators -161 | 6-3 | Loss | -161 | 31 h 44 m | Show | |
This is an 8* ASSASSIN on Nashville Predators. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Revenge: The Predators will be looking to avenge a 3-2 OT loss to the Flyers on November 27th. Home ice advantage: Nashville is 13-8-2 at home, while Philadelphia is only 10-11-2 on the road. ATS statistics: Philadelphia is just 7-11 (-2.2 units) this year in non-conference games, while Nashville is 9-6 (+2.6 units) after scoring one goal or less in its previous outing. The bottom line: The situation and trends that are clearly working in favor of the home side makes this a price in which we have no issues at all in laying. Play on NASHVILLE. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-04-16 | Bruins -145 v. Sabres | 3-2 | Win | 100 | 30 h 50 m | Show | |
This is an 8* MID-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Boston Bruins. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. No need to overanalyze this one in our opinion, this play is based on a couple of different common sense factors: Classic letdown spot: Buffalo beat the Sens 3-2 to finish the first half and then opened the second with a convincing 4-2 win at Montreal just last night. Suffice it to say, this definitely falls into a classic letdown position for the home side. Road warriors: The Bruins lost their final home game before the break in a 6-2 setback to the Ducks and then let a two goal lead slip away on Tuesday in a 4-3 OT setback to the Leafs to open the second half. Boston though has played its best hockey on the road this year, going 15-5-2 away from friendly confines. ATS statistics: Note that Boston is 12-8 (+2.3 units) vs. the division this year, while Buffalo is just 7-11 (-1.8) vs. the division and 10-31 (-10.9 units) in its last 21 when playing on back-to-back days. The bottom line: The situation and trends point to BOSTON as the savvy move in this contest. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-04-16 | Wild v. Rangers -143 | 2-4 | Win | 100 | 30 h 46 m | Show | |
This is a 6* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the New York Rangers. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a couple of common sense factors: Revenge: Both teams are struggling with consistency on both ends of the ice, but the Rangers play with revenge today after falling 5-2 to the Wild on December 17th. Home ice advantage: Despite their recent struggles, the Rangers have done a great job this season in taking care of team’s in front of the home town crowd, going 18-5-2 in the Big Apple. Conversely, the Wild are a poor 9-10-5 away from friendly confines. ATS statistics: Note that the Wild are just 8-9 (-4.2 units) in all non-conference games this year, while the Rangers are 12-8 (+2.2 units) in the same position. The bottom line: Both teams are also dealing with injury issues, but the home ice advantage, the revenge factor along with what we feel to be a great price pushes the scales in favor of NEW YORK in this one. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-02-16 | Kings -144 v. Coyotes | Top | 6-2 | Win | 100 | 26 h 32 m | Show |
This is a 10* WEST-COAST EXPRESS on the LA Kings. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Revenge: LA has lost three of the last four in the series, including a 3-2 setback on January 23rd. A nice first half surprise, BUT …: Arizona is 24-20 and was definitely a nice surprise in the first half, but note that the team did back its way into the break, going 2-4-1 in its last seven. A poor offense is to blame, the Coyotes have gone just 1 for 23 on the power play, while totalling just eight goals over their last six games. Road warriors: The Kings had their fair share of ups and downs in the first half as well, but the team has done very well on the road, going 6-2 their last eight away from friendly confines. ATS statistics: Note that LA is 19-7 (+6.4 units) this season in trying to revenge a loss vs. an opponent, while Arizona is just 14-43 (-19.5 units) the last three years vs. teams with winning records. The bottom line: Revenge is a powerful motivating factor and we expect it to be the difference maker in this one, play on the KINGS. AAA Sports |
|||||||
02-02-16 | Wild v. Islanders -138 | 3-5 | Win | 100 | 24 h 33 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the New York Islanders. We don't subscribe to any one single handicapping methodology, but instead feel that being flexible with ones approach is the best way to secure profits over the longterm. Sometimes we keep it simple, while other times we'll take into account a bunch of different factors, like motivation, scheduling and significant injuries. Recognizing classic "spot bets" is something we always do as well, IE: the "look ahead" spot, the "let down" spot and the "trap" game. The actual contestants on the field of play rarely enter into our equation when making selections, unless it's a Top 3 player like a LeBron James or Aaron Rodgers etc. One set of criteria which we almost always use when making our decisions, are Against The Spread (ATS) statistics. Sometimes these stats can be overrated and other times they help foreshadow the outcome of a contest. This particular play is based on a few different factors: Zero momentum: The Wild finished the first half with a winning 23-17-9 record, but backed their way into the break, their final contest of the first half was brutal, giving up a short-handed goal late in the third, only to then go on to lose 2-1 in a shootout to Arizona last Monday. Minnesota would close January in a 1-6-1 slide. Revenge situation: To say this is a revenge game would be a bit of an understatement we think, the Isles have dropped three straight in the series, including two in a row in front of the home town crowd. Goaltenders a “wash”: Devan Dubnyk has a 1.67 GAA over a 1-4-1 span, while Jaroslav Halak is 2-1-1 with a 1.72 GAA in his last four starts, while going 2-0-1 with a 0.86 mark vs. Minnesota. ATS statistics: Note that Minnesota is already just 2-5 (-4.6 units) this season when playing with three or more days rest, while the Islanders are 12-6 (+4.9 units) in all non-conference games this year. The bottom line: Both teams will clearly be hungry, but the ISLANDERS have the motivation advantage as well as home ice and all things considered, we definitely feel that the price is right in this one. AAA Sports |
|||||||
01-26-16 | Blackhawks -144 v. Hurricanes | 0-5 | Loss | -144 | 28 h 55 m | Show | |
This is an 8* MID-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Chicago Blackhawks. |
|||||||
01-25-16 | Flames v. Stars -195 | 1-2 | Win | 100 | 30 h 31 m | Show | |
This is a 6* BIG TIGER on the Dallas Stars. |
|||||||
01-23-16 | Wild v. Sharks -133 | 3-4 | Win | 100 | 26 h 46 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the San Jose Sharks. |
|||||||
01-21-16 | Oilers v. Stars -190 | 2-3 | Win | 100 | 29 h 46 m | Show | |
This is a 6* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Dallas Stars. |
|||||||
01-19-16 | Canucks v. Rangers -180 | 2-3 | Win | 100 | 30 h 42 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the New York Rangers. |
|||||||
01-18-16 | Penguins v. Blues -134 | 2-5 | Win | 100 | 10 h 57 m | Show | |
This is a 7* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the St. Louis Blues. |
|||||||
01-17-16 | Hurricanes v. Penguins -151 | Top | 0-5 | Win | 100 | 24 h 15 m | Show |
This is a 10* SITUATIONAL REVENGE DESTRUCTION on the Pittsburgh Penguins. |
|||||||
01-16-16 | Stars v. Sharks -116 | 3-4 | Win | 100 | 33 h 32 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL REVENGE DESTRUCTION on the San Jose Sharks. |
|||||||
01-16-16 | Capitals -181 v. Sabres | 1-4 | Loss | -181 | 29 h 3 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Washington Capitals. |
|||||||
01-15-16 | Bruins -135 v. Sabres | 4-1 | Win | 100 | 9 h 59 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Boston Bruins. |
|||||||
01-14-16 | Oilers v. Sharks -175 | 1-2 | Win | 100 | 32 h 45 m | Show | |
This is a 7* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the San Jose Sharks. |
|||||||
01-13-16 | Panthers v. Flames +104 | Top | 0-6 | Win | 104 | 30 h 1 m | Show |
This is a 10* REVENGE BIG TIGER on the Calgary Flames. |
|||||||
01-13-16 | Bruins -108 v. Flyers | 2-3 | Loss | -108 | 29 h 32 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Boston Bruins. |
|||||||
01-12-16 | Blue Jackets v. Islanders -191 | 2-5 | Win | 100 | 28 h 49 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the New York Islanders. |
|||||||
01-11-16 | Red Wings v. Kings -179 | 2-4 | Win | 100 | 33 h 17 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the LA Kings. |
|||||||
01-09-16 | Blues v. Kings -156 | 2-1 | Loss | -156 | 32 h 40 m | Show | |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on the Sacramento Kings. |
|||||||
01-09-16 | Wild v. Stars -145 | 2-1 | Loss | -145 | 29 h 10 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Dallas Stars. |
|||||||
01-09-16 | Maple Leafs v. Sharks -136 | 0-7 | Win | 100 | 28 h 11 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the San Jose Sharks. |
|||||||
01-05-16 | Jets v. Predators -160 | 4-1 | Loss | -160 | 30 h 21 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Nashville Predators. |
|||||||
01-04-16 | Senators v. Blues -195 | 3-2 | Loss | -195 | 31 h 53 m | Show | |
This is a 6* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the St. Louis Blues. |
|||||||
01-03-16 | Jets v. Ducks -170 | 1-4 | Win | 100 | 32 h 15 m | Show | |
This is a 6* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Anaheim Ducks. |
|||||||
01-02-16 | Red Wings -115 v. Sabres | 4-3 | Win | 100 | 21 h 24 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Detroit Red Wings. |
|||||||
12-29-15 | Ducks v. Flames -120 | 1-0 | Loss | -120 | 31 h 53 m | Show | |
This is an 8* WEST-COAST EXPRESS on the Calgary Flames. |
|||||||
12-27-15 | Oilers v. Flames -150 | 3-5 | Win | 100 | 32 h 11 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Calgary Flames. |
|||||||
12-22-15 | Jets v. Flames -134 | 1-4 | Win | 100 | 31 h 48 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Calgary Flames. |
|||||||
12-21-15 | Maple Leafs v. Avalanche -175 | 7-4 | Loss | -175 | 31 h 24 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Colorado Avalanche. |
|||||||
12-20-15 | Flames v. Red Wings -160 | 2-4 | Win | 100 | 25 h 47 m | Show | |
This is an 8* MID-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Detroit Red Wings. |
|||||||
12-17-15 | Flames v. Stars -196 | 3-1 | Loss | -196 | 31 h 20 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Dallas Stars. |
|||||||
12-15-15 | Avalanche v. Blackhawks -190 | 3-0 | Loss | -190 | 30 h 25 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Chicago Blackhawks. |
|||||||
12-12-15 | Senators v. Canadiens -125 | 1-3 | Win | 100 | 27 h 59 m | Show | |
This is an 8* MID-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Montreal Canadiens. |
|||||||
12-11-15 | Hurricanes v. Ducks -193 | 5-1 | Loss | -193 | 33 h 0 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Anaheim Ducks. |
|||||||
12-08-15 | Hurricanes v. Stars -203 | 5-6 | Win | 100 | 13 h 9 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Dallas Stars. |
|||||||
12-06-15 | Jets v. Blackhawks -178 | 1-3 | Win | 100 | 26 h 6 m | Show | |
This is a 6* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Chicago Blackhawks. |
|||||||
12-04-15 | Stars -136 v. Oilers | 1-2 | Loss | -136 | 32 h 39 m | Show | |
This is an 8* MID-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Dallas Stars. |
|||||||
12-03-15 | Coyotes v. Red Wings -171 | 1-5 | Win | 100 | 30 h 56 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Detroit Red Wings. |
|||||||
12-01-15 | Sabres v. Red Wings -178 | 4-5 | Win | 100 | 28 h 24 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Detroit Red Wings. |
|||||||
11-30-15 | Hurricanes v. Rangers -200 | 3-4 | Win | 100 | 27 h 56 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the New York Rangers. |
|||||||
11-28-15 | Flyers v. Rangers -200 | 3-0 | Loss | -200 | 19 h 3 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the New York Rangers. |
|||||||
11-27-15 | Oilers v. Red Wings -171 | 3-4 | Win | 100 | 30 h 59 m | Show | |
This is a 6* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Detroit Red Wings. |
|||||||
11-25-15 | Senators v. Avalanche -119 | 5-3 | Loss | -119 | 29 h 45 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Colorado Avalanche. |
|||||||
11-23-15 | Hurricanes v. Flyers -146 | 2-3 | Win | 100 | 30 h 55 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Philadelphia Flyers. |
|||||||
11-21-15 | Blackhawks v. Canucks +112 | 3-6 | Win | 112 | 33 h 4 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Vancouver Canucks. |
|||||||
11-19-15 | Rangers v. Lightning -113 | Top | 1-2 | Win | 100 | 27 h 21 m | Show |
This is a 10* EAST-COAST EXPRESS on the Tampa Bay Lightning. |
|||||||
11-19-15 | Blue Jackets v. Senators -123 | Top | 0-3 | Win | 100 | 27 h 20 m | Show |
This is a 10* ART OF THE GAME on the Ottawa Senators. |
|||||||
11-18-15 | Blackhawks -150 v. Oilers | Top | 4-3 | Win | 100 | 28 h 37 m | Show |
This is a 10* GAME OF THE MONTH on the Chicago Blackhawks. |
|||||||
11-14-15 | Avalanche v. Canadiens -190 | 6-1 | Loss | -190 | 27 h 26 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Montreal Canadiens. |
|||||||
11-13-15 | Blue Jackets v. Penguins -180 | 2-1 | Loss | -180 | 28 h 33 m | Show | |
This is a 6* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Pittsburgh Penguins. |
|||||||
11-12-15 | Oilers v. Coyotes -140 | 1-4 | Win | 100 | 30 h 9 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Arizona Coyotes. |
|||||||
11-12-15 | Devils v. Blackhawks -180 | 3-2 | Loss | -180 | 30 h 39 m | Show | |
This is a 5* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Chicago Blackhawks. |
|||||||
11-07-15 | Penguins v. Flames +110 | Top | 2-5 | Win | 110 | 12 h 6 m | Show |
This is a 10* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Calgary Flames. |
|||||||
11-04-15 | Panthers v. Ducks -145 | 2-3 | Win | 100 | 34 h 44 m | Show | |
This is an 8* MID-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Anaheim Ducks. |
|||||||
11-03-15 | Kings v. Blues -130 | 3-0 | Loss | -130 | 11 h 31 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the St. Louis Blues. |
|||||||
11-02-15 | Kings v. Blackhawks -120 | 2-4 | Win | 100 | 32 h 5 m | Show | |
This is a 6* WEST-COAST EXPRESS on the Chicago Blackhawks. |
|||||||
11-01-15 | Predators v. Ducks -115 | Top | 2-4 | Win | 100 | 10 h 49 m | Show |
This is a 10* ASSASSIN on the Anaheim Ducks. |
|||||||
10-31-15 | Bruins v. Lightning -165 | 3-1 | Loss | -165 | 10 h 47 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Tampa Bay Lightning. |
|||||||
10-27-15 | Montreal Canadiens v. Vancouver Canucks +114 | Top | 1-5 | Win | 114 | 30 h 57 m | Show |
This is a 10* UNDERDOG SUPER PLAY on the Vancouver Canucks. |
|||||||
10-24-15 | Detroit Red Wings v. Vancouver Canucks -150 | 3-2 | Loss | -150 | 33 h 24 m | Show | |
This is an 8* LATE-NIGHT BAIL-OUT BLOWOUT on the Vancouver Canucks. |
|||||||
10-24-15 | Arizona Coyotes v. Ottawa Senators -162 | 4-1 | Loss | -162 | 30 h 28 m | Show | |
This is a 7* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Ottawa Senators. |
|||||||
10-22-15 | New Jersey Devils v. Ottawa Senators -173 | 5-4 | Loss | -173 | 27 h 26 m | Show | |
This is a 7* BIG-CHALK CHOKE-OUT on the Ottawa Senators. |
|||||||
10-17-15 | San Jose Sharks v. NY Islanders -133 | 3-6 | Win | 100 | 26 h 47 m | Show | |
This is an 8* COAST-TO-COAST EXPRESS on the New York Islanders. |
|||||||
10-17-15 | Detroit Red Wings v. Montreal Canadiens -157 | 1-4 | Win | 100 | 25 h 19 m | Show | |
This is a 7* EAST-COAST EXPRESS on the Montreal Canadiens. |
|||||||
10-16-15 | Minnesota Wild v. Los Angeles Kings -159 | 1-2 | Win | 100 | 28 h 28 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the LA Kings. |
|||||||
10-16-15 | Colorado Avalanche v. Anaheim Ducks -175 | 3-0 | Loss | -175 | 28 h 58 m | Show | |
This is a 7* play on the Anaheim Ducks. |
|||||||
10-16-15 | Toronto Maple Leafs v. Columbus Blue Jackets -180 | 6-3 | Loss | -180 | 25 h 58 m | Show | |
This is a 6* play on the Columbus Blue Jackets. |
|||||||
10-15-15 | Ottawa Senators v. Pittsburgh Penguins -167 | 0-2 | Win | 100 | 21 h 3 m | Show | |
This is a 7* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Pittsburgh Penguins. |
|||||||
10-12-15 | Florida Panthers v. Philadelphia Flyers -126 | Top | 0-1 | Win | 100 | 28 h 29 m | Show |
This is a 10* EASTERN-CONFERENCE GAME OF THE WEEK on the Philadelphia Flyers. |
|||||||
10-12-15 | Tampa Bay Lightning v. Boston Bruins +123 | 6-3 | Loss | -100 | 23 h 31 m | Show | |
This is an 8* "ART OF THE GAME" on the Boston Bruins. |
|||||||
10-12-15 | Winnipeg Jets v. NY Islanders -129 | 2-4 | Win | 100 | 22 h 30 m | Show | |
This is a 7* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the New York Islanders. |
|||||||
10-10-15 | Edmonton Oilers v. Nashville Predators -179 | 0-2 | Win | 100 | 27 h 42 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Nashville Predators. |
|||||||
10-10-15 | Ottawa Senators -135 v. Toronto Maple Leafs | 5-4 | Win | 100 | 27 h 42 m | Show | |
This is an 8* play on the Ottawa Senators. |
|||||||
10-09-15 | Arizona Coyotes v. Los Angeles Kings -230 | 4-1 | Loss | -230 | 26 h 27 m | Show | |
This is a 6* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the LA Kings. |
|||||||
06-15-15 | Tampa Bay Lightning v. Chicago Blackhawks -156 | 0-2 | Win | 100 | 35 h 48 m | Show | |
This is an 8* BLOCKBUSTER on the Chicago Blackhawks. |
|||||||
06-10-15 | Tampa Bay Lightning v. Chicago Blackhawks -155 | 1-2 | Win | 100 | 32 h 16 m | Show | |
This is an 8* BLOCKBUSTER on the Chicago Blackhawks. |
|||||||
06-08-15 | Tampa Bay Lightning v. Chicago Blackhawks -150 | Top | 3-2 | Loss | -150 | 35 h 42 m | Show |
This is a 10* ART OF WAR on the Chicago Blackhawks. |
|||||||
06-06-15 | Chicago Blackhawks v. Tampa Bay Lightning -124 | Top | 3-4 | Win | 100 | 55 h 36 m | Show |
This is a 10* ART OF WAR on the Tampa Bay Lightning. |
|||||||
06-03-15 | Chicago Blackhawks v. Tampa Bay Lightning -115 | Top | 2-1 | Loss | -115 | 80 h 53 m | Show |
This is a 10* FINALS GAME OF THE YEAR on the Tampa Bay Lightning. |
|||||||
05-26-15 | NY Rangers v. Tampa Bay Lightning -125 | 7-3 | Loss | -125 | 26 h 51 m | Show | |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on the Tampa Bay Lightning. |
|||||||
05-23-15 | Anaheim Ducks v. Chicago Blackhawks -145 | Top | 4-5 | Win | 100 | 34 h 29 m | Show |
This is a 10* WESTERN-CONFERENCE FINALS GAME OF THE YEAR on the Chicago Blackhawks. |
|||||||
05-17-15 | Chicago Blackhawks v. Anaheim Ducks -135 | Top | 1-4 | Win | 100 | 79 h 21 m | Show |
This is a 10* GAME OF THE YEAR on the Anaheim Ducks. |
|||||||
05-13-15 | Washington Capitals v. NY Rangers -165 | 1-2 | Win | 100 | 35 h 25 m | Show | |
This is an 8* DESTRUCTION on the New York Rangers. |
|||||||
05-12-15 | Tampa Bay Lightning -155 v. Montreal Canadiens | 4-1 | Win | 100 | 24 h 16 m | Show | |
This is an 8* SITUATIONAL DESTRUCTION on the Tampa Bay Lightning. |
|||||||
05-09-15 | Tampa Bay Lightning v. Montreal Canadiens -116 | Top | 1-2 | Win | 100 | 33 h 38 m | Show |
This is a 10* BLOCKBUSTER on the Montreal Canadiens. |
- Early Lines
- High Limits
- NEW VIP Rewards
- VIP Program
- Mobile Betting
- Crypto
- VIP Program
- Crypto
- Live & Mobile Betting!
- Crypto
- Live & Mobile Betting
- 48 Hour Payouts
- 35% Crypto Bonus
- Live Betting
- Mobile Friendly
Guaranteed Winners or your money back and Free Picks in the NFL football, NBA basketball, MLB baseball, NCAA college football and basketball, Nascar Racing, Arena Football nhl hockey leagues and more.
We are part of the internets Premier Sports Handicappers League with full documentation of all members on this sports betting news and info portal. Free Membership, Join Today and start Winning!
For any resources you could need like sports handicapping odds, handicapping stats, schedules, or handicappers free picks and tips please click on any of the links on the right hand side of this page.