<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 NFC East Lines / NFL Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capperspicks.com/blog/nfl/nfc-east-2009-predictions-odds-150709/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capperspicks.com/blog/nfl/nfc-east-2009-predictions-odds-150709/</link>
	<description>Free + Paid Sports Picks - Sportsbook Reviews - Football Betting Predictions + Top Sports Handicappers Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schwab</title>
		<link>http://www.capperspicks.com/blog/nfl/nfc-east-2009-predictions-odds-150709/comment-page-1/#comment-2234</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schwab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capperspicks.com/blog/?p=11953#comment-2234</guid>
		<description>I would have to disagree with you that the Giants are the most complete team in the East. That may have been true last season, but when you compare their off season aquisitions and departures with Philadelphia, the Eagles to me are the most balanced team going into this season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to disagree with you that the Giants are the most complete team in the East. That may have been true last season, but when you compare their off season aquisitions and departures with Philadelphia, the Eagles to me are the most balanced team going into this season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

