<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009/10 NFL Strength of Schedule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capperspicks.com/blog/nfl/2009-strength-of-schedule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capperspicks.com/blog/nfl/2009-strength-of-schedule/</link>
	<description>Free + Paid Sports Picks - Sportsbook Reviews - Football Betting Predictions + Top Sports Handicappers Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:44:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schwab</title>
		<link>http://www.capperspicks.com/blog/nfl/2009-strength-of-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schwab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capperspicks.com/blog/?p=10127#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>The main problem with strength of schedule is that it is based on last year&#039;s results. I understand you have to have some form of measurement, but the way team&#039;s records can flip flop from one season to the next, schedule strength really has no bearing on predicting wins/losses for next season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main problem with strength of schedule is that it is based on last year&#8217;s results. I understand you have to have some form of measurement, but the way team&#8217;s records can flip flop from one season to the next, schedule strength really has no bearing on predicting wins/losses for next season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
